2013
DOI: 10.3888/tmj.15-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Boolean Computation to Solve Some Problems from Ramsey Theory

Abstract: Using some examples from Ramsey theory, this article shows how to use Mathematicaʼs Boolean computational capability. ‡ Introduction Mathematica's industrial-strength Boolean computation capability is not used as often as it should be. There probably are several reasons for this lack of use, but it is our view that a primary reason is lack of experience in expressing mathematical problems in the form required for Boolean computation. We look at a typical problem that is susceptible to Boolean analysis and show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cowen [9] used Mathematica's Boolean computational abilities to investigate some questions from graph Ramsey theory. In particular, he converted the problem of calculating R(K s , K t ) into a satisfiabilty problem.…”
Section: Calculating R(g H) Using Propositional Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cowen [9] used Mathematica's Boolean computational abilities to investigate some questions from graph Ramsey theory. In particular, he converted the problem of calculating R(K s , K t ) into a satisfiabilty problem.…”
Section: Calculating R(g H) Using Propositional Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…blue[{2, 4}] || ! blue[{3, 4}])terminated.In[9], Cowen explored R(G 1 , G 2 , G 3 ), where G i were complete graphs. We ask the natural question "Is it feasible to adapt Cowen's approach to compute new diagonal graph Ramsey numbers R(G, G), where G is any simple connected graph?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing Mathematica' s Boolean capability I was able to show that in several other cases the answer also was e=1(some of these examples appear in [1]). I began to conjecture that this might always be true, but didn't have any ideas on how to prove or disprove it nor did I know if anyone had already solved this problem.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%