2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using borehole geophysical data as soft information in indicator kriging for coal quality estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indicator coding has been covered in various papers related to indicator kriging or indicator simulation (e.g., Bastante et al, 2008;de Souza and Costa, 2013;Webber et al, 2013). Indicator data can be modeled, of course, for spatial correlation using semivariograms.…”
Section: Methodology and Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicator coding has been covered in various papers related to indicator kriging or indicator simulation (e.g., Bastante et al, 2008;de Souza and Costa, 2013;Webber et al, 2013). Indicator data can be modeled, of course, for spatial correlation using semivariograms.…”
Section: Methodology and Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mineral exploration, geophysical surveys are predominantly carried out for anomaly separation and delineation of geological structures. However, there are some studies about grade and reserve estimation by geophysical methods including copper grade estimation in blast holes using prompt gamma neutron activation analysis (PGNAA) in Chuquicamata copper mine in Chile (Charbucinski et al, 2003), investigation of organic pollutions effect on IP-Rs measurements in laboratory based on its results detection of pollution zone in Aveiro, Portugal (Martinho and Almeida, 2006), ore reserve estimation by VES and chemical analyses (Ehinola et al, 2009), correlation between geoelectrical data and aquifer parameters in evaluation of ground water potential (Batte et al, 2010), estimation of Ni grade using crosshole seismic velocity tomography in Canada (Perozzi et al, 2012), coal quality estimation using borehole geophysical data (Webber et al, 2013), reserve estimation of limestone and sand using geoelectrical data (Ushie et al, 2014) and predicting the pyrite oxidation and transport process in coal waste pile using resistivity methods in Iran (Jodeiri et al, 2016), At large, these studies include three subjects: I) estimation of hydraulic parameters of aquifer and hydrogeological parameters by geoelectrical data; II) estimation of grade and chemical parameters using well logging geophysical data and III) evaluation of lithology and dynamic parameters using geophysical methods that used in geotechnical investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proximate analysis of coal samples determines the relative amounts of ash, moisture content, volatile matter, and fixed carbon, whereas ultimate analysis is used to determine the chemical constituents of coal samples: carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, sulfur, and other elements. Many regression equations and nonlinear models, including the artificial neural network method, have been developed for predicting the calorific values of a coal sample based on proximate and ultimate analyses. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proximate parameters and useful heat values (UHVs) are obtained from the conventional analysis of the coal core samples. Statistical and neural network methods are introduced by the researchers for estimation of proximate parameters from geophysical logs. , Previously, authors had indicated that the coal seams in the Bishrampur coalfield are of high moisture content and of banded type. The overall quality of an Indian non-coking coal seam is determined from proximate analysis and UHVs of coal samples obtained from existing bands in that seam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%