“…In mineral exploration, geophysical surveys are predominantly carried out for anomaly separation and delineation of geological structures. However, there are some studies about grade and reserve estimation by geophysical methods including copper grade estimation in blast holes using prompt gamma neutron activation analysis (PGNAA) in Chuquicamata copper mine in Chile (Charbucinski et al, 2003), investigation of organic pollutions effect on IP-Rs measurements in laboratory based on its results detection of pollution zone in Aveiro, Portugal (Martinho and Almeida, 2006), ore reserve estimation by VES and chemical analyses (Ehinola et al, 2009), correlation between geoelectrical data and aquifer parameters in evaluation of ground water potential (Batte et al, 2010), estimation of Ni grade using crosshole seismic velocity tomography in Canada (Perozzi et al, 2012), coal quality estimation using borehole geophysical data (Webber et al, 2013), reserve estimation of limestone and sand using geoelectrical data (Ushie et al, 2014) and predicting the pyrite oxidation and transport process in coal waste pile using resistivity methods in Iran (Jodeiri et al, 2016), At large, these studies include three subjects: I) estimation of hydraulic parameters of aquifer and hydrogeological parameters by geoelectrical data; II) estimation of grade and chemical parameters using well logging geophysical data and III) evaluation of lithology and dynamic parameters using geophysical methods that used in geotechnical investigations.…”