2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2019.8802963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using C3D to Detect Rear Overtaking Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method was evaluated using five classification models (Table 2), six regression models (Table 3) and three semantic similarity models (Table 4). We used five image classification models: LeNet5 [46], DenseNet201 [47], ResNet152 [48], VGG16 [49], and C3D [50]. We used three regression models: the recurrent neural network (RNN), the long short-term memory network (LSTM), and the gated recurrent unit network (GRU) [51].…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method was evaluated using five classification models (Table 2), six regression models (Table 3) and three semantic similarity models (Table 4). We used five image classification models: LeNet5 [46], DenseNet201 [47], ResNet152 [48], VGG16 [49], and C3D [50]. We used three regression models: the recurrent neural network (RNN), the long short-term memory network (LSTM), and the gated recurrent unit network (GRU) [51].…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 53 ], the results report the overtaking detection with 98 true positives, 5 false positives, 3 false negatives, at the precision and recall rates of 95.1% and 97.0%, respectively. The work in [ 54 ] shows the precision and recall rates of 96.3% and 86.9%, respectively. In the proposed method, the precision rates for ’city traffic’, ’highway’, and ’night’ are 88.7%, 98.8%, and 90.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Implementation and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%