2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2537-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Cameras for Precise Measurement of Two-Dimensional Plant Features: CASS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a high correlation between relative tuber area (estimated based upon calibration using a size standard) and gravimetric measurements of tuber size was observed in the A08241 population, this trend may not be as robust in other populations where tuber size exhibits greater variation along the z-axis, which cannot be quantified from the 2-dimensional images captured in this study. In the future, these platforms could potentially be improved by incorporating a repeating calibration pattern to improve measurement accuracy (Tabb et al, 2020) and multiple cameras (Tabb et al, 2019) or depth sensors to estimate object length along the z-axis Su et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a high correlation between relative tuber area (estimated based upon calibration using a size standard) and gravimetric measurements of tuber size was observed in the A08241 population, this trend may not be as robust in other populations where tuber size exhibits greater variation along the z-axis, which cannot be quantified from the 2-dimensional images captured in this study. In the future, these platforms could potentially be improved by incorporating a repeating calibration pattern to improve measurement accuracy (Tabb et al, 2020) and multiple cameras (Tabb et al, 2019) or depth sensors to estimate object length along the z-axis Su et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). A camera as scanner (Tabb et al 2022) was used to calibrate the camera for each image and allow for measurements to be computed from the image in millimeters. For pixel-to-millimeter conversion for the camera as scanner, the number was set at 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pixel-to-millimeter conversion for the camera as scanner, the number was set at 3. The image was segmented into a grape cluster (white) and nongrape cluster (black) regions using intensity information from the ArUco tags (Tabb et al 2022). To account for any slight variation in the camera angle, the image was warped such that 3 pixels were equivalent to 1 mm and preliminarily segmentated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arUco patterns were 11.76 mm 2 . CAmera aS Scanner (Tabb et al 2019;Tabb 2020), a method for calibrating cameras, was used to convert the image from pixels with an unknown physical size to pixels with a per mm scaling, similar to the type of images given by a flatbed scanner (the scaling is 10 pixels per mm for this study). CAmera aS Scanner requires that a calibration pattern is in the scene and camera metadata is available.…”
Section: Automated Size Measurements Of Halyomorpha Halys (Stål) (Het...mentioning
confidence: 99%