2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using catastrophe theory to describe railway system safety and discuss system risk concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Hallowell and Gambatese (2009) proposed an activity-based total risk quantification of concrete formwork in their research [28]. The authors utilized a risk quantification method that was proffered formerly by Jannadi and Almishari (2003) and Baradan and Usmen (2006) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. They accepted accident frequency as an accident probability parameter.…”
Section: Literature Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Hallowell and Gambatese (2009) proposed an activity-based total risk quantification of concrete formwork in their research [28]. The authors utilized a risk quantification method that was proffered formerly by Jannadi and Almishari (2003) and Baradan and Usmen (2006) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. They accepted accident frequency as an accident probability parameter.…”
Section: Literature Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marsh & Bearfield [13] described a method of modelling organizational causes of accidents, using Bayesian Networks. Y. Wang et al [14] applied the cusp catastrophe model to describe the dynamic changing process of railway system safety.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A catastrophe evaluation method quantifies the relative importance of indices according to the internal contradictions and mechanisms in normalization equations of the system, and reduces the subjective factors in the evaluation process effectively. The method has been widely used in several research fields, including water resources assessment [25,26], mapping floods susceptibility [27], safety analysis of railway systems [28], and quantitative analysis of a non-equilibrium phase transition process [29].…”
Section: Common Catastrophe Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%