2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46119-1_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using CBR for Automation of Software Design Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table III shows a comparison among different approaches in the literature [10]. Based on this survey and our preliminary results with DPR, from Table III, we can draw a clear conclusion that DPR is more efficient with a few additional features, compared to ESSDP [8], ReBuilder [9] and Recommender System [6] in terms of flexible weighting scheme and package (models) refactoring scope.…”
Section: B Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table III shows a comparison among different approaches in the literature [10]. Based on this survey and our preliminary results with DPR, from Table III, we can draw a clear conclusion that DPR is more efficient with a few additional features, compared to ESSDP [8], ReBuilder [9] and Recommender System [6] in terms of flexible weighting scheme and package (models) refactoring scope.…”
Section: B Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…But complex design problems are not manageable, also no user feedback is associated with this approach, which makes it obsolete. Gomes et al [9] proposed an approach that exploits user experience to suggest suitable patterns using the ReBuilder framework. ReBuilder adopts a case-based reasoning approach, where cases represent situations in which a pattern was already applied in the past in a software design.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing literature there are reported attempts to produce recommendations for Design Patterns such as (Gomes et al 2002;Guéhéneuc and Mustapha 2007;Weiss and Birukou 2007) but none of them was taking into account the context or has produced a complete prototype solution for specific target groups such as CS or SE students which ArchReco supports.…”
Section: As "A Collection Of Module and Subroutine Interfaces Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design Patterns are examined from many different perspectives such as the recovery of Design Patterns from existing software tools (Rasool and Streitferdt 2011), Formalization and Reasoning Design Patterns (Bayley and Zhu 2008;Hou and Hoover 2006), or generate Design Patterns repositories other than the well-known GoF patterns (Gamma et al 1995) like for example the yahoo design patterns repository https://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/. It is worth noting that in publications related to the recommendation algorithms for Design Patterns (Gomes et al 2002;Guéhéneuc and Mustapha 2007;Weiss and Birukou 2007) we have not found applied recommendation algorithms that were used in software tools. It is also worth noting that there is not reported work where context was used as part of the recommendation mechanisms for the computation of recommendations for Design Patterns.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation