2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using CF0218-ELISA to distinguish Chlamydophila felis-infected cats from vaccinated and uninfected domestic cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current detection methods for C. felis include isolation and identification of the pathogen, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and PCR assay ( Clarkson and Philips 1997 ; Helps et al 2001 ; Ohya et al 2010 ; Wons et al 2017 ; Barimani et al 2019 ) However, these methods need sophisticated equipment for a PCR assay and a relatively lengthy readout time for ELISA. Thus, there is an urgent need for a simple and faster detection method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current detection methods for C. felis include isolation and identification of the pathogen, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and PCR assay ( Clarkson and Philips 1997 ; Helps et al 2001 ; Ohya et al 2010 ; Wons et al 2017 ; Barimani et al 2019 ) However, these methods need sophisticated equipment for a PCR assay and a relatively lengthy readout time for ELISA. Thus, there is an urgent need for a simple and faster detection method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%