2019
DOI: 10.4271/2019-01-1140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Chemical Kinetics to Understand Effects of Fuel Type and Compression Ratio on Knock-Mitigation Effectiveness of Various EGR Constituents

Abstract: <div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) can be used to mitigate knock in SI engines. However, experiments have shown that the effectiveness of various EGR constituents to suppress knock varies with fuel type and compression ratio (CR). To understand some of the underlying mechanisms by which fuel composition, octane sensitivity (S), and CR affect the knock-mitigation effectiveness of EGR constituents, the current paper presents results from a ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the air entering the engine can be saturated, and some fuel can enter as liquid. This may lead to more pronounced temperature and equivalence ratio inhomogeneities in the charge, as well as the end-gas, altering the knocking tendency of the test fuel. In contrast, the heater between the intake air thermocouple and the mixture thermocouple allows full vaporization of the PRFs, as well as alcohol fuels in MON tests. This leads to superior performance from fuels with a higher latent heat of vaporization than PRF mixtures at RON conditions than at MON conditions. Discounting any impact of latent heat of vaporization, the fuels’ chemical reactivity may exhibit a different sensitivity to temperature.…”
Section: Fuel Response To Variation In Ron and Mon Test Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the air entering the engine can be saturated, and some fuel can enter as liquid. This may lead to more pronounced temperature and equivalence ratio inhomogeneities in the charge, as well as the end-gas, altering the knocking tendency of the test fuel. In contrast, the heater between the intake air thermocouple and the mixture thermocouple allows full vaporization of the PRFs, as well as alcohol fuels in MON tests. This leads to superior performance from fuels with a higher latent heat of vaporization than PRF mixtures at RON conditions than at MON conditions. Discounting any impact of latent heat of vaporization, the fuels’ chemical reactivity may exhibit a different sensitivity to temperature.…”
Section: Fuel Response To Variation In Ron and Mon Test Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low temperature chemistry however does not scale with the engine speed, and is highly reliant on residence time, which decreases linearly with increasing engine speed. With lesser time for low temperature reactions at higher engine speeds, the PRF90 relative reactivity is not as high, compared to the one at low engine speeds [36]. This is pertinent to conventional octane ratings, RON and MON, wherein the engine is operated at 600 and 900 rpm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suppression of LTHR at low temperatures may lead to a reduction in the charge heating of the end gas during normal combustion. While this process is beneficial in terms of a fuels knock resistance (by lowering the end gas temperature and pressure), under normal combustion peak pressures it may be reduced. However, this seems unlikely to be significant at spark advance timings so far from knocking timings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%