2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-021-10250-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index

Abstract: The Deglutition Handicap Index (DHI) is a self-report measure for patients at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia on deglutition-related aspects of functional health status (FHS) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The DHI consists of 30 items which are subsumed within the Symptom, Functional and Emotional subscales. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the DHI using Classic Test Theory according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Items representing different dysphagia-related aspects of daily life and referring to either the psychosocial aspect of dysphagia, such as emotional, functional, or physical aspects, were related to each other. According to several [ 19 - 21 ] investigations, DHI is the most reliable tool for assessing the psychosocial impact of dysphagic patients, and it is most suitable for clinical purposes given the 25 items and the use of a uniform simple scoring format. The Cronbach’s alpha of the DHI total score supported the assumption that DHI is a unidimensional measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items representing different dysphagia-related aspects of daily life and referring to either the psychosocial aspect of dysphagia, such as emotional, functional, or physical aspects, were related to each other. According to several [ 19 - 21 ] investigations, DHI is the most reliable tool for assessing the psychosocial impact of dysphagic patients, and it is most suitable for clinical purposes given the 25 items and the use of a uniform simple scoring format. The Cronbach’s alpha of the DHI total score supported the assumption that DHI is a unidimensional measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swallowing disorders were characterized by:(a) clinical severity: (a) severe: massive primary and secondary inhalations, ineffective/absent cough, history or risk of pneumonia and presence of nutritional complications; (b) moderate: ineffective cough, possible inhalation, history or risk of pneumonia, moderate stasis, but no malnutrition; (c) mild: no primary and secondary inhalations, slight complications. Stasis of saliva or alimentary product has been classified as mild, moderate, and severe, in agreement with the physician's subjective judgment after product intake;(b) presence (yes/no) of choking/laryngeal penetration, corresponding to the visualization of food or liquids passing into the larynx;(c) presence (yes/no) of an airway protective mechanism (closure of the vocal cords, effective cough);(d) the presence (yes/no) of an oral transit defect, most often coinciding with retention of food in the mouth due to lack of initiation of swallowing;(e) presence (yes/no) of a pharyngeal transit defect resulting in the presence of food residue in the valleculae and/or the pyriform sinuses after the effort of swallowing; Collection of pulmonary events (pneumonia) since disease onset and current nutritional complications (including at least one of the three following conditions: malnutrition, defined as a body max index [BMI] < 21, changes in food consistency and need of nutritional supplement). The Deglutition Handicap Index (DHI) score, a self‐administered questionnaire on quality of life (QoL) related to swallowing problems 12 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency reliability is checked by calculating the Cronbach α coefficient based on the standardization terms for the entire questionnaire separately as well as for each subscale. A low Cronbach's alphas less than 0.70 indicates insufficient internal consistency, while a high Cronbach's alphas greater than 0.90 indicates project redundancy [28][29][30] . The structural validity is mainly reflected by the value of the KMO coefficient and the Bartlett sphericity test.…”
Section: Item Response Theory (Irt) Methods Can Contribute With Impor...mentioning
confidence: 99%