Using Co-design in Mobile Health System Development: A Qualitative Study With Experts in Co-design and Mobile Health System Development

Abstract

Background The proliferation of mobile devices has enabled new ways of delivering health services through mobile health systems. Researchers and practitioners emphasize that the design of such systems is a complex endeavor with various pitfalls, including limited stakeholder involvement in design processes and the lack of integration into existing system landscapes. Co-design is an approach used to address these pitfalls. By recognizing users as experts of their own experience, co-design directly involves users in the design process and provides them an active role in knowledge development, idea generation, and concept development. Objective Despite the existence of a rich body of literature on co-design methodologies, limited research exists to guide the co-design of mobile health (mHealth) systems. This study aims to contextualize an existing co-design framework for mHealth applications and construct guidelines to address common challenges of co-designing mHealth systems. Methods Tapping into the knowledge and experience of experts in co-design and mHealth systems development, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study consisting of 16 semistructured interviews. Thereby, a constructivist ontological position was adopted while acknowledging the socially constructed nature of reality in mHealth system development. Purposive sampling across web-based platforms (eg, Google Scholar and ResearchGate) and publications by authors with co-design experience in mHealth were used to recruit co-design method experts (n=8) and mHealth system developers (n=8). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis along with our objectives of contextualizing the co-design framework and constructing guidelines for applying co-design to mHealth systems development. Results The contextualized framework captures important considerations of the mHealth context, including dedicated prototyping and implementation phases, and an emphasis on immersion in real-world contexts. In addition, 7 guidelines were constructed that directly pertain to mHealth: understanding stakeholder vulnerabilities and diversity, health behavior change, co-design facilitators, immersion in the mHealth ecosystem, postdesign advocates, health-specific evaluation criteria, and usage data and contextual research to understand impact. Conclusions System designers encounter unique challenges when engaging in mHealth systems development. The contextualized co-design framework and constructed guidelines have the potential to serve as a shared frame of reference to guide the co-design of mHealth systems and facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration at the nexus of information technology and health research.

Personal Goals, Barriers to Self-Management and Desired mHealth Application Features to Improve Self-Care in Multi-Ethnic Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study

“…It has been recommended that app features be tailored to the cultural norms and values of users to enhance the acceptability, adherence, and effectiveness of interventions [25][26][27]. Perspectives of patients are crucial to the co-development of mHealth features aimed at enhancing self-management skills and fostering patients' motivations for continued use [28]. Therefore, building on the existing literature, this study aimed to explore personal goals, barriers to self-management, and views of a mHealth app and its features among multi-ethnic Asian patients with T2DM.…”

Acceptability of an In-home Multimodal Sensor Platform for Parkinson Disease: Nonrandomized Qualitative Study

“…Ideally, any outcomes being measured by technological devices would be clinically relevant, associated with health-related quality of life [7], and developed in collaboration with the patient population under study [8,9]. We have limited knowledge about the perspectives of people with PD regarding the acceptability of multimodal sensors, including cameras, in the home environment.…”

Perceptions of Diet Quality, Advice, and Dietary Interventions in Individuals with Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration; A Qualitative Research Study

“…Patient perspectives can also allow for new insights into difficulties or issues with existing interventions [29]. Collaborative co-design considers the patient perspective, and has been shown to increase participant engagement and long-term sustainability of interventions [30].…”