2008
DOI: 10.1080/13658810701626236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using co‐occurrence models for placename disambiguation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key problem is the ambiguity of toponyms [4,17]. The same place name can refer to different geographic entities (e.g., the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names returns 102 places for the toponym Santa Barbara; many of them being populated places).…”
Section: Gir'14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A key problem is the ambiguity of toponyms [4,17]. The same place name can refer to different geographic entities (e.g., the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names returns 102 places for the toponym Santa Barbara; many of them being populated places).…”
Section: Gir'14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale behind this approach is based on the cooccurrence model from existing works [17,12]. One geographic place is always associated with a unique set of other entities, such as nearby cities, higher-level administrative units, physical geographic features (e.g., rivers and moun- tains), and related persons.…”
Section: Integrating Dbpedia Entities For Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations