2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.571330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Co-segregation and Loss of Heterozygosity Analysis to Define the Pathogenicity of Unclassified Variants in Hereditary Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract: The use of gene panels introduces a new dilemma in the genetics field due to the high frequency of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The objective of this study was to provide evidence that may help in the classification of these germline variants in terms of their clinical impact and association with the disease in question. A total of 52 unrelated women at-risk for HBOC and negative for BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants were evaluated through a gene panel comprising 14 breast and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the presence of germline variants in BRCA1 / BRCA2 / TP53 genes was conducted at the Center of Molecular Diagnosis of BCH as part of routine care through Sanger/panel NGS sequencing followed by MLPA (Multiplex Ligation‐dependent Probe Amplification Analysis) rearrangement analysis, as previously described (Fernandes et al, 2016). It is worth noting that 36 women, among the 52 included in this study, were previously analyzed in a 14‐gene NGS panel including high and moderate breast/ovarian cancer genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2 MRE11, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, TP53 , and STK11 ; Grasel et al, 2020 accepted).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the presence of germline variants in BRCA1 / BRCA2 / TP53 genes was conducted at the Center of Molecular Diagnosis of BCH as part of routine care through Sanger/panel NGS sequencing followed by MLPA (Multiplex Ligation‐dependent Probe Amplification Analysis) rearrangement analysis, as previously described (Fernandes et al, 2016). It is worth noting that 36 women, among the 52 included in this study, were previously analyzed in a 14‐gene NGS panel including high and moderate breast/ovarian cancer genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2 MRE11, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, TP53 , and STK11 ; Grasel et al, 2020 accepted).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The allele frequency of the variants was visually verified with IGV software, 22 and loss of wild-type allele was considered positive when variant allelic fractions were higher than 65% or 15% higher than the VAF in germline DNA. 23 24 This method was previously validated by our group and detected LOH in 90% of breast cancer tissues from BRCA1 GPV carriers (data not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although a greater number of studies in this review have focused their attention on the CHEK2 and ATM gene, the second most mutated non- BRCA gene, curiously, was MUTYH . Ten different pathogenic variants were found in the MUTYH gene with a total of 34 mutated patients (Additional file 1 ), distributed in three studies [ 24 , 38 , 44 ]. In highlight, the c.1187G > A variant was reported in fifteen patients with HBOC in Brazil, including 13 patients from the cohort of Guindalini et al [ 44 ], been this variant responsible for a significant proportion of pathogenic mutations in the MUTYH gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%