2018
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using codesign to develop a culturally tailored, behavior change mHealth intervention for indigenous and other priority communities: A case study in New Zealand

Abstract: The obesity rate in New Zealand is one of the highest worldwide (31%), with highest rates among Māori (47%) and Pasifika (67%). Codesign was used to develop a culturally tailored, behavior change mHealth intervention for Māori and Pasifika in New Zealand. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the codesign methods and processes and describe how these were used to inform and build a theory-driven approach to the selection of behavioral determinants and change techniques. The codesign approach … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have stated that a co-productive and co-designed approach is necessary in the development of interventions that seek to improve community well-being outcomes. Examples of such interventions include healthy aging programs [19,20] nonmedical mental health interventions [21], community-based support for young onset dementia [19] and a mobile health programme to reduce obesity [22]. This statement is based on the perception that each community has unique socioeconomic and environmental features that influence the community's well-being [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have stated that a co-productive and co-designed approach is necessary in the development of interventions that seek to improve community well-being outcomes. Examples of such interventions include healthy aging programs [19,20] nonmedical mental health interventions [21], community-based support for young onset dementia [19] and a mobile health programme to reduce obesity [22]. This statement is based on the perception that each community has unique socioeconomic and environmental features that influence the community's well-being [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement is based on the perception that each community has unique socioeconomic and environmental features that influence the community's well-being [20]. As a result, generic interventions will not lead to positive outcomes in every situation and engaging community members in the development of well-being interventions through co-production and co-design makes explicit the main priorities for well-being improvement, resulting in a practical and effective intervention [19,[21][22][23]. The evidence indicate that co-production and co-design can also empower communities [22,24] and enable them to have a sense of ownership of an intervention [23] consequently encouraging their participation in the delivered service [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information increases transparency to users and offers protection for researchers. Finally, depending on the specific population and their needs, researchers may wish to adopt a co-design approach to designing and constructing their app interventions [39]. Specifically, to learn about the needs, attitudes, and preferences of their end users, health researchers may wish to conduct mixed method studies to understand how to best tailor an app intervention [40] to inform phase 1 (establishing a theoretical framework) or phase 2 (wireframe and content development) of the app building process [27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working in partnership with stakeholders in the design process can better serve app development. By doing so, developers can more easily identify desirable features for an app as well as obstacles hindering long-term usage; together, app developers and stakeholders could improve the viability, usability, and effectiveness of apps in health care services [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%