2015
DOI: 10.1080/1359866x.2015.1060295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using cogenerative dialogues to improve coteaching for language learner (LL) students in an inclusion science classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Training KSL teachers to be able to support science teachers in mainstream classrooms to integrate discipline specific language and literacy skills with scaffolding techniques that use both inquiry-based and language-based strategies can improve science and KSL teachers' confidence and pedagogical knowledge for teaching CLD student populations (Durgunoglu & Hughes, 2010;Echevarria, et al, 2006). Beyond developing new teacher education programs, policies can be developed that allow teacher education programs to design add-on certifications that offer coursework designed to train specialized teachers how adapt curriculum and instruction to meet the needs of CLD students and model how to use content-specific strategies in content classrooms through co-teaching (Im & Martin, 2015).…”
Section: Policy To Support Improved Educational Outcomes For Cld Studmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Training KSL teachers to be able to support science teachers in mainstream classrooms to integrate discipline specific language and literacy skills with scaffolding techniques that use both inquiry-based and language-based strategies can improve science and KSL teachers' confidence and pedagogical knowledge for teaching CLD student populations (Durgunoglu & Hughes, 2010;Echevarria, et al, 2006). Beyond developing new teacher education programs, policies can be developed that allow teacher education programs to design add-on certifications that offer coursework designed to train specialized teachers how adapt curriculum and instruction to meet the needs of CLD students and model how to use content-specific strategies in content classrooms through co-teaching (Im & Martin, 2015).…”
Section: Policy To Support Improved Educational Outcomes For Cld Studmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have shown that for teachers to create effective science learning environments for their students, they need to be aware of their personal beliefs about science and about teaching and learning. Other studies have found that teachers' cultural beliefs (related to social norms, customs and values) (Wang, 2004;Martin, 2006) and personal biases regarding gender (Jones & Wheatley, 1990;She, 2000), race and ethnicity (Atwater, Lance, Woodard, & Johnson, 2013), linguistic ability (Lee, Luykx, Buxton, & Shaver, 2007;Im & Martin, 2015;, and student ability (Kirch, Bargerhuff, Cowan, & Wheatly, 2007) can also influence their decisions and actions in the science classroom. Currently, there is a dearth of research examining how teacher beliefs and attitudes may impact learning for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) 1 students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that doing cogen necessitates the re-defining of roles of the people involved to ensure collective responsibility (Tobin & Roth, 2002;Ritchie, Mackay, & Rigano, 2006). This can potentially translate to better rapport, trust, respect and relationship between the people (Im & Martin, 2015). Clearly, cogen contrasts with the usual teacher-student classroom talk.…”
Section: Cogenerative Dialogue (Cogen)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emancipatory feature of PAR transpired from a study by Im and Martin (2015). The purpose of the study was to allow the teachers to have a better understanding of students' learning behavior.…”
Section: Integrating Cogen In Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation