Using collective expert judgements to evaluate quality measures of mass spectrometry images

Abstract

Motivation: Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a maturating technique of molecular imaging. Confidence in the reproducible quality of IMS data is essential for its integration into routine use. However, the predominant method for assessing quality is visual examination, a time consuming, unstandardized and non-scalable approach. So far, the problem of assessing the quality has only been marginally addressed and existing measures do not account for the spatial information of IMS data. Importantly, no approach exists for unbiased evaluation of potential quality measures.Results: We propose a novel approach for evaluating potential measures by creating a gold-standard set using collective expert judgements upon which we evaluated image-based measures. To produce a gold standard, we engaged 80 IMS experts, each to rate the relative quality between 52 pairs of ion images from MALDI-TOF IMS datasets of rat brain coronal sections. Experts’ optional feedback on their expertise, the task and the survey showed that (i) they had diverse backgrounds and sufficient expertise, (ii) the task was properly understood, and (iii) the survey was comprehensible. A moderate inter-rater agreement was achieved with Krippendorff’s alpha of 0.5. A gold-standard set of 634 pairs of images with accompanying ratings was constructed and showed a high agreement of 0.85. Eight families of potential measures with a range of parameters and statistical descriptors, giving 143 in total, were evaluated. Both signal-to-noise and spatial chaos-based measures performed highly with a correlation of 0.7 to 0.9 with the gold standard ratings. Moreover, we showed that a composite measure with the linear coefficients (trained on the gold standard with regularized least squares optimization and lasso) showed a strong linear correlation of 0.94 and an accuracy of 0.98 in predicting which image in a pair was of higher quality.Availability and implementation: The anonymized data collected from the survey and the Matlab source code for data processing can be found at: https://github.com/alexandrovteam/IMS_quality.Contact: theodore.alexandrov@embl.de

OffsampleAI: artificial intelligence approach to recognize off-sample mass spectrometry images

“…Here, we decided to explore the potential of machine and deep learning approaches to tackle a problem which on a small scale can be solved by an expert: recognition of off-sample ion images. Our expertise in creating a high-quality gold standard [13] together with the exploited techniques of modern web development helped create a high-quality gold standard of 23, 238 images.…”

Recognizing off-sample mass spectrometry images with machine and deep learning

“…Here, we decided to explore the potential of machine and deep learning approaches to tackle a problem which on a small scale can be solved by an expert: recognition of off-sample ion images. Our expertise in creating a high-quality gold standard (Palmer et al , 2015) together with the exploited techniques of modern web development helped create a high-quality gold standard of 23238 images.…”

ColocAI: artificial intelligence approach to quantify co-localization between mass spectrometry images

“…Altogether it required 95 emails solely for communicating with the rankers. Despite having expertise in performing crowdsourcing studies in imaging MS (Ovchinnikova et al , 2019;Palmer et al , 2015) and overwhelmingly positive support of METASPACE users in performing the ranking, running this study would not be possible without access to diverse public data in METASPACE and without using modern web technologies employed for the RankColoc web app that both critically facilitated the process. The achieved average pairwise correlation between the rankers (mean Spearman 0.791) confirms a strong inter-ranker agreement.…”