Using Complexity Assessment to Inform the Development and Deployment of a Digital Dashboard for Schizophrenia Care: Case Study

Abstract

Background Health care is becoming more complex. For an increasing number of individuals, interacting with health care means addressing more than just one illness or disorder, engaging in more than one treatment, and interacting with more than one care provider. Individuals with severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia are disproportionately affected by this complexity. Characteristic symptoms can make it harder to establish and maintain relationships. Treatment failure is common even where there is access to effective treatments, increasing suicide risk. Knowledge of complex adaptive systems has been increasingly recognized as useful in understanding and developing health care. A complex adaptive system is a collection of interconnected agents with the freedom to act based on their own internalized rules, affecting each other. In a complex health care system, relevant feedback is crucial in enabling continuous learning and improvement on all levels. New technology has potential, but the failure rate of technology projects in health care is high, arguably due to complexity. The Nonadoption, Abandonment, and challenges to Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework and complexity assessment tool (NASSS-CAT) have been developed specifically to help identify and manage complexity in technology-related development projects in health care. Objective This study aimed to use a pilot version of the NASSS-CAT instrument to inform the development and deployment of a point-of-care dashboard supporting schizophrenia care in west Sweden. Specifically, we report on the complexity profile of the project, stakeholders’ experiences with using NASSS-CAT, and practical implications. Methods We used complexity assessment to structure data collection and feedback sessions with stakeholders, thereby informing an emergent approach to the development and deployment of the point-of-care dashboard. We also performed a thematic analysis, drawing on observations and documents related to stakeholders' use of the NASSS-CAT to describe their views on its usefulness. Results Application of the NASSS framework revealed different types of complexity across multiple domains, including the condition, technology, value proposition, organizational tasks and pathways, and wider system. Stakeholders perceived the NASSS-CAT tool as useful in gaining perspective and new insights, covering areas that might otherwise have been neglected. Practical implications derived from feedback sessions with managers and developers are described. Conclusions This case study shows how stakeholders can identify and plan to address complexities during the introduction of a technological solution. Our findings suggest that NASSS-CAT can bring participants a greater understanding of complexities in digitalization projects in general.

Digital primary and community healthcare: practitioner’s experience in Stockholm during the Covid-19 pandemic and future development

“…This nding is different from observations from other studies which stress the importance of a well-resourced and intentional strategy. However, many group participants stressed the need for systematic staff training during "normal conditions," which is consistent with reports from other authors about what is necessary to achieve widespread implementation [48,49,54,55].…”

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders

“…For this study, two outpatient clinics were chosen for data collection because they had piloted a ‘digital dashboard’ that enabled easier data collection with digital questionnaires and visualization of results to help patients and healthcare professionals to jointly assess progress. The details of this ‘digital dashboard’ project are described elsewhere [ 18 ].…”

Adopt, adapt, or abandon technology-supported person-centred care initiatives: healthcare providers’ beliefs matter

“…It was first published in 2017 by Trisha Greenhalgh and colleagues [13]. To our knowledge, current publications cover the development and extension of the NASSS framework [35][36][37], empirical applications of the NASSS framework [12,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], reviews and synthesis guided by NASSS [46], and a few research protocols based on the framework [47][48][49].…”