Using computed tomography enterography to evaluate patients with Crohn's disease: what impact does examiner experience have on the reproducibility of the method?

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the impact that examiner experience has on the reproducibility and accuracy of computed tomography (CT) enterography in the detection of radiological signs in patients with Crohn's disease.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study involving the analysis of CT enterography scans of 20 patients with Crohn's disease. The exams were analyzed independently by two radiologists in their last year of residence (duo I) and by two abdominal imaging specialists (duo II). The interobserver agreement of each pair of examiners in identifying the main radiological signs was calculated with the kappa test. The accuracy of the examiners with less experience was quantified by using the consensus among three experienced examiners as a reference.ResultsDuo I and duo II obtained a similar interobserver agreement, with a moderate to good correlation, for mural hyperenhancement, parietal thickening, mural stratification, fat densification, and comb sign (kappa: 0.45-0.64). The less experienced examiners showed an accuracy > 80% for all signs, except for lymph nodes and fistula, for which it ranged from 60% to 75%.ConclusionLess experienced examiners have a tendency to present a level of interobserver agreement similar to that of experienced examiners in evaluating Crohn's disease through CT enterography, as well as showing satisfactory accuracy in identifying most radiological signs of the disease.

A Reliability Study: Strong Inter-Observer Agreement of an Expert Panel for Intestinal Ultrasound in Ulcerative Colitis

“…For computed tomography, substantial to good inter-observer agreement was found for disease presence and individual parameters in CD. 30 , 31 For magnetic resonance enterography, fair to good agreement for individual parameters and good inter-observer agreement for multiple scoring indices was found. 32–34 Because we found substantial to almost perfect inter-observer agreement to detect disease activity, the reliability of IUS could be considered as at least as good as other cross-sectional imaging techniques.…”

Evaluating inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease by cross-sectional imaging techniques

“…There are also some recognized limitations of MRE in comparison with CTE (15,19) : limited availability; higher cost; longer examination time; lower spatial and temporal resolution; greater susceptibility to motion artifacts; and a smaller number of radiologists with experience in its interpretation. The last item is relevant, given that examiner experience has been found to have no substantial impact on the reproducibility of the assessment of patients with Crohn's disease when CTE is used (22) .…”

Relevance of monitoring transmural disease activity in patients with Crohn’s disease: current status and future perspectives

“…45,65,85 TR is most commonly defined on IUS, CT, and MRE by BWT <3 mm. 7,73,86,87 Unlike some of the other parameters, the reliability of this measure is high and reduction in thickness quantifiable, while other parameters such as BWS or inflammatory fat reduction/absence can be more challenging to reliably measure changes. 54 Other imaging findings are commonly considered in the assessment of imaging remission, including absence of contrast enhancement, and reduction/resolution in inflammatory fat.…”