2018
DOI: 10.34105/j.kmel.2018.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using concept mapping to measure changes in interdisciplinary learning during high school

Abstract: How, when and what kind of learning takes place are key questions in all educational environments. School graduates are expected to have reached a development level whereby they have, among many fundamental skills, the ability to think critically, to plan their studies and their future, and to integrate knowledge across disciplines. However, it is challenging to develop these skills in schools. Following existing curricula, disciplines are often taught separately and by different teachers, making it difficult … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Valid relationship and crosslink are two concept map components whose link scores increase in all stages of PjBL with expanded teacher questions. Valid relationship is a relationship of concepts through meaningful links (Kinchin, 2000;Kinchin et al, 2000;Novak et al, 1983Novak et al, , 1984Reiska et al, 2018;Zimmerman et al, 2011) that are propositions (Novak et al, 1984;Reiska et al, 2018;Zimmerman et al, 2011). Crosslink is valid relationship that has links in different hierarchies (Novak et al, 1984;Zimmerman et al, 2011).…”
Section: Expanded Teacher Question To Valid Relationship and Crosslinkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Valid relationship and crosslink are two concept map components whose link scores increase in all stages of PjBL with expanded teacher questions. Valid relationship is a relationship of concepts through meaningful links (Kinchin, 2000;Kinchin et al, 2000;Novak et al, 1983Novak et al, , 1984Reiska et al, 2018;Zimmerman et al, 2011) that are propositions (Novak et al, 1984;Reiska et al, 2018;Zimmerman et al, 2011). Crosslink is valid relationship that has links in different hierarchies (Novak et al, 1984;Zimmerman et al, 2011).…”
Section: Expanded Teacher Question To Valid Relationship and Crosslinkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the meaning of links on crosslinks in concept map, the presence of crosslinks is a better thinking indicator. Reiska et al (2018) state that crosslink is an indicator of HOTs. Thus, the expanded teacher questions used in the PjBL stages play a role in improving students' thought processes through the ability to organize the characteristics of the genus Marchantiophyta in a hierarchy.…”
Section: Expanded Teacher Question To Valid Relationship and Crosslinkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search words used included "(Science or STEM) and (interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary or cross-disciplinary or integrated) and assessment." Reiska et al (2018) examined the change of high school students' ID understanding throughout two years of schooling and explored differences in ID understanding among students from different schools. The authors used a concept mapping method to discover ID understanding and employed an automatic analysis applying a numeric interdisciplinary quality index (IQI) to assess multiple concept maps.…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Science Assessments and Their Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The capacity to integrate knowledge and modes of thinking in two or more disciplines or established areas of expertise to produce a cognitive advancement-such as explaining a phenomenon, solving a problem, or creating a product-in ways that would have been impossible or unlikely through single disciplinary means" (p. 219). Reiska et al (2018) operationalized ID understanding as "students' overall ability to connect knowledge from different fields and their ability to integrate disciplines" (p. 2), which is conceptualized based on the definitions from Boix Mansilla and Duraisingh (2007) and Klein (1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation