2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using conditional inference forests to identify the factors affecting crash severity on arterial corridors

Abstract: The authors were able to identify roadway locations where severe crashes tend to occur. For example, segments and access points were found to be riskier for single vehicle crashes. Higher skid resistance and k-factor also contributed toward increased severity of injuries in crashes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower daily average traffic volume leads, in general, to higher severity injuries. This finding is consistent with a number of previous studies that have shown that crash severity is higher on low-traffic volume roads, and significantly decreases with increasing volumes, presumably due to better safety design on highways with high traffic volumes (see Das et al, 2009, Christoforou et al, 2010, and Chen and Chen, 2011. Lower traffic volume could be related with higher speeds that more often lead to severe crashes.…”
Section: Environmental Factorssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lower daily average traffic volume leads, in general, to higher severity injuries. This finding is consistent with a number of previous studies that have shown that crash severity is higher on low-traffic volume roads, and significantly decreases with increasing volumes, presumably due to better safety design on highways with high traffic volumes (see Das et al, 2009, Christoforou et al, 2010, and Chen and Chen, 2011. Lower traffic volume could be related with higher speeds that more often lead to severe crashes.…”
Section: Environmental Factorssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Machine learning techniques have become popular in many disciplines [4446] to analyze non-experimental/observational data, as they often have lower requirements with respect to input data quality. Several algorithms used in earlier studies in similar contexts [27,44,45,47], as well as others with potentially desirable characteristics, were evaluated in relation to the main characteristics of our problem: (i) observational error and noisy data in both predictors and response variables, (ii) high likelihood of non-linear relationships between predictors and yield, (iii) high potential for correlated predictors, and (iv) the need to retrieve the relevant variables that actually explain the yield variability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ensemble approach that combines outputs from a collection of trees reduces prediction error and is usually more stable (Das et al, 2009;De'ath, 2007;Elith et al, 2008). There are two ensemble approaches based on decision trees: random forests and boosted regression trees (BRT).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%