2020
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2020.0056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Crip Theory to Reimagine Student Development Theory as Disability Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Racist ableist discourses simultaneously positioned non-APIDA Black and Brown students as less intelligent, capable, and productive, while reinforcing the model minority myth for APIDA students. Whereas scholars such as Abes and Wallace (2020) build on crip theory to argue that “compulsory able-bodiedness and able-mindedness are the dominant discourses that push people toward an unobtainable normalcy, determining who is disabled and therefore less worthy” and maintain “the dominant discourses of able-bodiedness and able-mindedness show up as ableist expectations of higher education” (Abes & Wallace, 2020, p. 576), I argue that because ability functioned as a property of whiteness (Annamma et al, 2013), Black and Brown students instead navigated racist ableism in which racialization and racism already positioned them as non-normative. As Annamma et al (2013) explain, “without racialized notions of ability, racial difference would simply be racial difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Racist ableist discourses simultaneously positioned non-APIDA Black and Brown students as less intelligent, capable, and productive, while reinforcing the model minority myth for APIDA students. Whereas scholars such as Abes and Wallace (2020) build on crip theory to argue that “compulsory able-bodiedness and able-mindedness are the dominant discourses that push people toward an unobtainable normalcy, determining who is disabled and therefore less worthy” and maintain “the dominant discourses of able-bodiedness and able-mindedness show up as ableist expectations of higher education” (Abes & Wallace, 2020, p. 576), I argue that because ability functioned as a property of whiteness (Annamma et al, 2013), Black and Brown students instead navigated racist ableism in which racialization and racism already positioned them as non-normative. As Annamma et al (2013) explain, “without racialized notions of ability, racial difference would simply be racial difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a growing body of research in higher education has considered how race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, documentation status, and other social positions intersect, dis/ability and ableism remain underemphasized and undertheorized (Abes & Wallace, 2018, 2020; Harris & Patton, 2019; Miller, 2018; Miller & Dika, 2018; Museus & Griffin, 2011; Stapleton, 2015). Intersectionality, a conceptual framework coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw but whose genealogy is deeply tied to social movement activism of Black women (and their alliances with other marginalized Women of Color) in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s, “is a way of understanding and analyzing the complexity of the world, in people, and in human experiences.…”
Section: Multiply-marginalized Black and Brown Students In Higher Edu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Along with the sense of belonging framework above, research focused on student development models in higher education (Abes et al, 2019;Patton et al, 2016) has shown consistently that students whose identities have been minoritized-specifically, LGBTQ+ students, students with disabilities, international students, and students identifying as members of groups that have been racially or ethnically minoritized-have a harder time feeling as if they belong on college campuses in the United States. For many of these students, college campuses are hostile, isolating, and unwelcoming as their individual and collective identities, experiences, and needs are continuously ignored or not taken into consideration at all (Johnson et al, 2007;Ostrove & Long, 2007;Strayhorn, 2012).…”
Section: Minoritized Identities and Sense Of Belonging In Higher Educ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. the normative and normalizing expectations of pace and scheduling’ (Abes and Wallace, 2020: 577), by making them more flexible in relation to a diversity of bodies and minds (Price, 2011).…”
Section: Ecologies Of Knowledges and Disabled Students’ Strategies: N...mentioning
confidence: 99%