2013
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2013.800911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using critical policy analysis to examine competing discourses in zero tolerance legislation: do we really want to leave no child behind?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CPA is informed by multiple theoretical underpinnings. For example, it has the bearing of critical theory in examining how instances of policy discourse reflect power dynamics in societies (Kennedy‐Lewis, 2014). It draws on an organisational theory reasoning in exploring policy content and directions in order to understand the way governments are likely to behave (Christensen, Lægreid, Roness, & Røvik, 2007).…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPA is informed by multiple theoretical underpinnings. For example, it has the bearing of critical theory in examining how instances of policy discourse reflect power dynamics in societies (Kennedy‐Lewis, 2014). It draws on an organisational theory reasoning in exploring policy content and directions in order to understand the way governments are likely to behave (Christensen, Lægreid, Roness, & Røvik, 2007).…”
Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy is a ‘set of shifting, diverse and contradictory responses to a spectrum of political issues’ (Edelman, , 16), made up of multiple interpretations (Yanow, ) and formulated into text. Frequently, policy texts are sites of competing discourses and ideologies, and are illustrative of power structures in policy, social issues and governance (Kennedy‐Lewis, ), which can shape personhood and constitute people in relation to a state (Yngvesson and Coutin, ). Treating policy as discourse permits the researcher to critique these discursive objects through examining power relationships and ideology, and identifying the broad structural features of society present in policy texts (Kennedy‐Lewis, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we were able to locate the implementation of CCSS ELA within a larger pervasive pattern of race and class-based state school segregation that explicitly and implicitly influences teaching and learning processes, including how teachers interpret and translate reading policies and mandates into classroom practices. In this way, we were able to depart from the myth of colour blindness that often dominates educational reform and policy discourse (Kennedy-Lewis, 2014), which is certainly critical to equitable reading reform efforts. The continual analysis of the influence of political manoeuvrings on effective literacy teaching and learning is significant because policy ‘can simultaneously limit our options as teachers and open up possibilities for pedagogy and curriculum’ (Stevens, 2003: 662).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%