2020
DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Culturally Relevant Pedagogy to Reconsider the Genetics Canon

Abstract: In this article, we explore culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) to work toward alleviating persistent underrepresentation in STEM fields of oppressed minorities. We argue that biology instructors can practice agency, or the capacity to act in ways that undermine opportunity gaps that lead to underrepresentation, by developing themselves into culturally relevant pedagogues who are committed to underrepresented minority (URM) students' learning and career success, who demonstrate cultural competence, and who deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further advance these efforts, we need to deepen our theoretical understandings related to DEI and ground our interventions and work in those theories. Some JMBE authors have already begun unpacking complex critical and social theories in recent years (see references 17 , 24 , 28 , 29 , and 38 as examples).…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To further advance these efforts, we need to deepen our theoretical understandings related to DEI and ground our interventions and work in those theories. Some JMBE authors have already begun unpacking complex critical and social theories in recent years (see references 17 , 24 , 28 , 29 , and 38 as examples).…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors appropriately postulate that this observation may be due to STEM climate, inclusivity, or cultural incongruence; however, the media shifted the narrative to blame girls for their internal lack of interest in STEM ( 65 ). This is problematic because the culture of science is exclusive in explicit and subtle ways, and these observations should not be blamed on the subjugated, as several JMBE authors have discussed ( 2 , 16 , 20 , 38 , 61 ). While this is a secondary source error and easier to dismiss as “not the scientists’ problem,” our community, from individual contributors to journals, should be cognizant of perpetuating subjugation in primary literature as well.…”
Section: Emergent Conceptual Categories From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These kinds of hypotheses (Williams, 2006; Goheen et al ., 2016; Kanias et al ., 2017; Ma et al ., 2018) are based on well-known examples of balanced disease alleles, but our data suggest that these examples are exceptions rather than the rule. It is important to recognize that, at least in biology classes, the use of racially-based genetic examples increases the belief that genes encode absolute, functional differences between races (Donovan, 2017; Sparks, Baldwin and Darner, 2020). This perspective neglects the fact that >90% of genetic differences among humans occur within populations, rather than across them (Rosenberg, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%