2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icecco48375.2019.9043203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using data mining techniques to predict and detect important features for book borrowing rate in academic libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a tree map of possible outcomes through a series of related choices and predicts the best choice based on their cost, benefit, and probability. In [4], several tree classification methods were employed. A survey was conducted on 200 university students' library usage, and the data was used to determine the correlation between features and outcome.…”
Section: The Role Of Machine Learning In Library Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a tree map of possible outcomes through a series of related choices and predicts the best choice based on their cost, benefit, and probability. In [4], several tree classification methods were employed. A survey was conducted on 200 university students' library usage, and the data was used to determine the correlation between features and outcome.…”
Section: The Role Of Machine Learning In Library Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review showed examples of exploitation in 11 papers (code U-2, 11/126 papers), whereby the data provided by patrons are used to analyse users' satisfaction (Ochilbek, 2019;Yue & Jia, 2008) or to make predictions concerning future requests (Litsey & Mauldin, 2018). Facebook posts from patrons can also be used to predict responses to different types of library posts (Gruss et al, 2020).…”
Section: Role Of the Usermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the authors address new technology as a useful tool or system (code AI-1, 51/126) or beneficial extension of human skills (code AI-2, 8/126). This viewpoint is most obvious in research and case reports that describe the concept or features of new applications for a variety of library services and operations, including acquisition and circulation (e.g., Iqbal et al, 2020;Ochilbek, 2019;Walker & Jiang, 2019), classification and subject indexing (e.g., Bethard et al, 2009;Golub et al, 2020;, resource retrieval and recommendations (e.g., Färber & Sampath, 2020;Hahn, 2019;Hahn & McDonald, 2018;Smith, 1976), or overall performance analysis (Ennis et al, 2013). These tools are described as automating some laborious or error-prone library operations, enabling faster processes in larger volumes and assisting with librarians' tasks.…”
Section: Role Of Ai (Non-human)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Ochilbek using a decision tree technique with 71.9% accuracy rate during training and 72% on test data showed that data mining could predict the behavior of library users based on borrowing transactions (Ochilbek, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%