2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00375.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using DC resistivity tomography to detect and characterize mountain permafrost

Abstract: Direct‐current (DC) resistivity tomography has been applied to different mountain permafrost regions. Despite problems with the very high resistivities of the frozen material, plausible results were obtained. Inversions with synthetic data revealed that an appropriate choice of regularization constraints was important, and that a joint analysis of several tomograms computed with different constraints was required to judge the reliability of individual features. The theoretical results were verified with three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inter-electrode spacing was 5 m in the largest sites (les Rognes and Tsarmine) and 4 m in Entre la Reille. Following Hauck et al (2003), salt-water saturated sponges were used to improve the electrical contact between electrodes and the porous surface material. Results were processed with Prosys II.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Tomography (Ert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-electrode spacing was 5 m in the largest sites (les Rognes and Tsarmine) and 4 m in Entre la Reille. Following Hauck et al (2003), salt-water saturated sponges were used to improve the electrical contact between electrodes and the porous surface material. Results were processed with Prosys II.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Tomography (Ert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground penetrating radar (GPR) has been used extensively in permafrost studies for identifying the boundaries of permafrost (e.g., Arcone et al, 1998;Doolittle et al, 1992;Hinkel et al, 2001;Moorman et al, 2003), characterizing ground ice structures (De Pascale et al, 2008;Hinkel et al, 2001;Moorman et al, 2003), and estimating seasonal thaw depth and moisture content of the active layer (Gacitua et al, 2012;Westermann et al, 2010). Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has also been widely applied in permafrost studies (Hauck et al, 2003;Ishikawa et al, 2001;Kneisel et al, 2000), the majority of which focus on mountain permafrost. By combining two or more geophysical methods complementary information can often be acquired raising the confidence in interpretations of permafrost characteristics (De Pascale et al, 2008;Hauck et al, 2004;Schwamborn et al, 2002).…”
Section: Y Sjöberg Et Al: Geophysical Mapping Of Palsa Peatland Permentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the application of 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) in mountain permafrost studies constitutes one of the most common geophysical methods for the prospecting of alpine periglacial landforms, such as rock glaciers, talus slopes and icecored moraines (e.g. Hauck et al, 2003;Marescot et al, 2003;Hilbich et al, 2009). ERT measurements were conducted by applying an electric current into the ground, measuring its intensity with two current electrodes and measuring the resulting difference of potential with two other electrodes.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Tomography (Ert)mentioning
confidence: 99%