2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-005-2903-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using DCMU-fluorescence method for the identification of dominant phytoplankton groups

Abstract: For the identification of ecologically significant dominant groups of phytoplanktonic algae a polychromatic DCMUinduced fluorescence method is recommended. A special fluorometer equipped with a system of replaceable filters is used to differentiate three regions of the spectrum (410 ± 20, 510 ± 20 and 540 ± 10 nm) that can excite the basic light-harvesting pigments. Total and differential (for every algal taxon studied) chlorophyll a calculated from the fluorescence signals is in good agreement with biomass es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5), which allows us to make a conclusion about applicability of the DCMU-fluorescence method for estimation of gross primary production of stream periphyton (epilithon). The main advantages of this method were described elsewhere (Gaevsky et al 2005), but, briefly, in the first, in contrast to PAM-fluorescence, it is possible to determine chlorophyll a concentration and relative variable fluorescence when biomass of periphyton is high and Cyanophyta dominate. The second, using inhibitor of electron-transfer chain (DCMU), allows avoiding the effect of photosynthesis on the specific fluorescence yield and the obtaining of actual potential photosynthetic activity of microalgae and chlorophyll a concentration data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5), which allows us to make a conclusion about applicability of the DCMU-fluorescence method for estimation of gross primary production of stream periphyton (epilithon). The main advantages of this method were described elsewhere (Gaevsky et al 2005), but, briefly, in the first, in contrast to PAM-fluorescence, it is possible to determine chlorophyll a concentration and relative variable fluorescence when biomass of periphyton is high and Cyanophyta dominate. The second, using inhibitor of electron-transfer chain (DCMU), allows avoiding the effect of photosynthesis on the specific fluorescence yield and the obtaining of actual potential photosynthetic activity of microalgae and chlorophyll a concentration data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorometer was equipped with a system of replaceable filters (410±20, 510±20 and 540±10 nm) for differentiation of three groups of dominant algal taxons: (1) Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta, (2) Bacillariophyta and Dinophyta, and (3) Cyanophyta. Calculation of Chl a was carried out using the visualization method described in (Gaevsky et al 2005). Total Chl a concentration was calculated as the sum of Chl a of all three groups.…”
Section: Fluorescence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 was from Gaevsky et al (2005). The chlorophyll a concentrations, mg m -3 , of the algae groups were multiplied by the depth (4.5 m from May to July and 3.5 m to the end of September) of the reservoir for recalculations of the chlorophyll content by depth, mg m -2 .…”
Section: Primary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence methods allow the identification of green algae, diatoms, and cyanobacteria in phytoplankton based on their differences in fluorescence excitation spectra (Gaevsky et al, 2005). Pigments from algae (chlorophylls a, b, c, carotenoids, including fucoxanthin, phycobilins, etc.)…”
Section: Microcystis Aeruginosa Fluorescence Method Euclidean Distamentioning
confidence: 99%