1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(97)00135-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using DEA To evaluate 29 Canadian textile companies — Considering returns to scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One perspective argues that because sales revenue is the ultimate goal of several intermediate outputs, it should be used as the sole output (see, e.g., Chandra, Cooper, Li, and Rahman 1998;Keh and Chu 2003;Leverty and Qian 2010;Demerjian et al 2012). Moreover, Dybvig and Warachka (2010) argue for a measure of operating efficiency based on revenue so that scale decisions and costs are properly assessed.…”
Section: 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One perspective argues that because sales revenue is the ultimate goal of several intermediate outputs, it should be used as the sole output (see, e.g., Chandra, Cooper, Li, and Rahman 1998;Keh and Chu 2003;Leverty and Qian 2010;Demerjian et al 2012). Moreover, Dybvig and Warachka (2010) argue for a measure of operating efficiency based on revenue so that scale decisions and costs are properly assessed.…”
Section: 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important references are provided to help the interested readers. So, DEA was used by many scholars to measure the efficiency of a manufacturing firm (Chandra et al, 1998;Friedman and Stern, 1998;Shammari, 1999;Sena, 2001;DÜzakin and DÜzakin, 2006;Chen and Chen, 2009;and Halim, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies on the measurement of efficiency in manufacturing firms with the utilization of DEA have used several inputs and outputs. Chandra et al (1998) have specified their inputs as number of employees, average annual investment over last ten years, and their outputs were annual sales values. On the other hand, Friedman and Stern (1998) specified their inputs as assets, average wage man-hours worked by employees, labor cost, materials and expenses, but their outputs were revenue, export revenue, and income due to work and repairs and assts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chandra et al (1998) evaluated 29 Canadian textile companies by using CCR-a data envelopment analysis model-where the inputs are number of employees and average annual investment over last 10 years and the outputs are annual sales values. Chandra also discussed the results of analysis in the perspective of income according to returns to scale.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%