2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2022.105867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using decomposition-based multi-objective algorithm to solve Selective Pickup and Delivery Problems with Time Windows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A metaheuristic method that combines a Pareto ant colony optimization algorithm and a variable neighborhood search method has been proposed for the bi-objective TOP (BTOP) [14]. Finally, a two-phase decomposition method based on Local Search has been proposed to solve Selective Pickup and Delivery Problems with Time Windows (SPDPTW) [1].…”
Section: Bi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A metaheuristic method that combines a Pareto ant colony optimization algorithm and a variable neighborhood search method has been proposed for the bi-objective TOP (BTOP) [14]. Finally, a two-phase decomposition method based on Local Search has been proposed to solve Selective Pickup and Delivery Problems with Time Windows (SPDPTW) [1].…”
Section: Bi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The route of a vehicle always starts at a depot and ends at the sink node. For instance, there are three vehicles in solution [1,2,6,4,11,1,5,7,3,11,1,7,3,11], the route of the first vehicle is…”
Section: Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently employed decomposition-based MOEA is MOEA/D, introduced by Zhang and Li 30 . The MOEA/D structure can incorporate various traditional single-objective optimization and localized search methods 33 35 . Indicator-based MOEAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gauge the potency of this proposed method, we employ distinct benchmark test functions: ZDT 65 , DTLZ 66 , Constraint 67 , 68 (CONSTR, TNK, SRN, BNH, OSY and KITA) and real-world engineering design Brushless DC wheel motor 69 (RWMOP1), Helical spring 68 (RWMOP2), Two-bar truss 68 (RWMOP3), Welded beam 70 (RWMOP4), Disk brake 71 (RWMOP5). The objective of this assessment is to compare the efficacy of our proposed method against MOMPA, NSGA-II, MOAOA, MOEA/D and MOGNDO, using metrics like generational distance (GD) 34 , inverse generational distance (IGD) 35 , hypervolume 36 , Spacing 37 , Spread 36 and run time (RT). The approximations of the Pareto-front produced by our method are evaluated using these metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aimed to gauge their capabilities in swiftly converging to the true Pareto optimal front and the distribution of the obtained non-dominated solutions. Upon assessing their convergence and coverage using MO metrics and the produced Pareto optimal fronts on benchmark suites (ZDT [ 54 ], DTLZ [ 54 ], Constraint [ 68 , 69 ] and engineering design problems [ 55 , 56 ]), we discerned that these algorithms still exhibited shortcomings in convergence and coverage using metrics like generational distance (GD) [ 70 ], inverse generational distance (IGD) [ 71 ], hypervolume [ 72 ], Spacing [ 73 ], Spread [ 72 ] and run time (RT). The approximations of the Pareto-front produced by our method are evaluated using these metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%