2016
DOI: 10.5959/eimj.v8i3.421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus in Concept Mapping Structure and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)

Abstract: The Delphi technique is a widely used and accepted method for gathering data from participants within domain of expertise. The objective of this study is to discuss the process of the three rounds Delphi technique in seeking a consensus of concept mapping structure and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) in Diabetic Mellitus subject. In the first, round, participants were given a structured questionnaire regarding item of concept mapping structure and MCQ in Diabetic Mellitus subject. The second were added mean an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The established Delphi process used for the formation of the Anatomical Society's Core Regional Anatomy Syllabus for Undergraduate Medicine Moxham et al 2014;Smith et al 2016a) was adopted for this study. The Delphi process is a consensus method that systematically facilitates and structures communication between experts to ascertain collective agreement on a single issue, through reiterated survey rounds (Keeney et al 2011;Ab Latif et al 2016;Smith et al 2016b). The Delphi process outlined in Smith et al (2016b) was modified to include a pilot panel of nurse educators, anatomists and clinical educational experts (n = 9).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The established Delphi process used for the formation of the Anatomical Society's Core Regional Anatomy Syllabus for Undergraduate Medicine Moxham et al 2014;Smith et al 2016a) was adopted for this study. The Delphi process is a consensus method that systematically facilitates and structures communication between experts to ascertain collective agreement on a single issue, through reiterated survey rounds (Keeney et al 2011;Ab Latif et al 2016;Smith et al 2016b). The Delphi process outlined in Smith et al (2016b) was modified to include a pilot panel of nurse educators, anatomists and clinical educational experts (n = 9).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experts must have a sound knowledge of the ‘target issue’ (Latif et al. ), in this case anatomy. The identification of participants to be invited to join the Delphi panel was undertaken in two phases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature suggests that a panel size of greater than 10 is acceptable (Adler & Ziglio, ; Hsu & Sandford, ; Latif et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller the quartile deviation, the smaller the degree of variation and higher the degree of consensus. Generally, the consensus level is considered high if the quartile deviation is ≤0.5 and medium if the quartile deviation is between 0.5–1; no consensus is established if the quartile deviation exceeds 1 (Ab Latif, Mohamed, Dahlan, & Mat Nor, ). At least 80% of the experts must agree on each item to achieve content validity in consensus development; statements that did not achieve 80% agreement were modified according to experts' feedback and redistributed to the panellists for the second round (Eubank et al., ; Vitale et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%