Using different Facebook advertisements to recruit men for an online mental health study: Engagement and selection bias

Abstract

A growing number of researchers are using Facebook to recruit for a range of online health, medical, and psychosocial studies. There is limited research on the representativeness of participants recruited from Facebook, and the content is rarely mentioned in the methods, despite some suggestion that the advertisement content affects recruitment success. This study explores the impact of different Facebook advertisement content for the same study on recruitment rate, engagement, and participant characteristics. Five Facebook advertisement sets (“resilience”, “happiness”, “strength”, “mental fitness”, and “mental health”) were used to recruit male participants to an online mental health study which allowed them to find out about their mental health and wellbeing through completing six measures. The Facebook advertisements recruited 372 men to the study over a one month period. The cost per participant from the advertisement sets ranged from $0.55 to $3.85 Australian dollars. The “strength” advertisements resulted in the highest recruitment rate, but participants from this group were least engaged in the study website. The “strength” and “happiness” advertisements recruited more younger men. Participants recruited from the “mental health” advertisements had worse outcomes on the clinical measures of distress, wellbeing, strength, and stress. This study confirmed that different Facebook advertisement content leads to different recruitment rates and engagement with a study. Different advertisement also leads to selection bias in terms of demographic and mental health characteristics. Researchers should carefully consider the content of social media advertisements to be in accordance with their target population and consider reporting this to enable better assessment of generalisability.

Impact of a Social Media Campaign on Reach, Uptake, and Engagement with a Free Web- and App-Based Physical Activity Intervention: The 10,000 Steps Australia Program

“…Popular social media websites include Facebook and Instagram, with 15 and 9 million users in Australia, respectively [8]. One significant benefit of applying social media tools to promote health programs is that promotional content can be tailored and targeted towards specific populations, making it much easier to fill gaps in the reach of programs [9]. Several systematic reviews examining the use and success of Facebook to recruit participants to health-related studies concluded that this method was superior compared to traditional recruitment methods in terms of lower costs, faster recruitment times, and recruitment of people with demographic characteristics more representative of the general population, other than an over-representation of white, young females [10,11].…”

A smartphone application for treating depressive symptoms: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

“…The study will also be promoted via members of the research team presenting at partner worksites. Social media advertising targeted at employed people will also be utilised to recruit individuals employed externally of partner organisations using an evidence-informed advertising approach [ 29 ]. Both males and females will be recruited.…”

Smartphone application for preventing depression: study protocol for a workplace randomised controlled trial

“…Social media advertising targeted at employed people will also be used to recruit beyond the partner organisations using a similar approach to previous studies. 37 The study will also be promoted via members of the research team presenting at partner worksites. Both men and women will be recruited, though it is anticipated that more than half of the sample will be men due to the focus on MDIs.…”