2011
DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2011.579188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using digital camera images to detect canopy condition of deciduous broad-leaved trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the date of start of green up, the date of end of senescence was less certain. This concurs with other studies (using satellite data) that suggest it is more challenging to measure this as a single date [44] but that this can be overcome using a different index of the data (e.g., green-red vegetation index (GRVI) [45]). In order to fully understand why there was error in the predicted dates the values of greenness would need disaggregating to the component vegetation types and further research into different methods of data smoothing and date extraction would be required (similar to that applied to satellite data [29,46]).…”
Section: Computed Phenological Datessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Compared with the date of start of green up, the date of end of senescence was less certain. This concurs with other studies (using satellite data) that suggest it is more challenging to measure this as a single date [44] but that this can be overcome using a different index of the data (e.g., green-red vegetation index (GRVI) [45]). In order to fully understand why there was error in the predicted dates the values of greenness would need disaggregating to the component vegetation types and further research into different methods of data smoothing and date extraction would be required (similar to that applied to satellite data [29,46]).…”
Section: Computed Phenological Datessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The SPAD values are calculated through the amount of light transmitted by the leaf in red light (650 nm) and infrared light (940 nm), which have different absorbance induced by chlorophyll. Although the relationship between SPAD values and chlorophyll contents could be linear, exponential or polynomial correlations for various kinds of plants species have been reported; this relationship could be affected by light conditions, chloroplast distribution or the level of chlorophyll concentrations, but overall, the dynamic curve of SPAD values could be used as the indicator of leaf chlorophyll contents (Markwell et al 1995, v www.esajournals.org Muraoka and Koizumi 2005, Uddling et al 2007, Naus et al 2010, Ling et al 2011, Nagai et al 2011, Djumaeva et al 2012, Scattolin et al 2013, Riccardi et al 2014. Furthermore, the daily leaf area index (LAI) values (lower frequency after the end of leaf expansion) within ROI were collected with the leaf area meter LAI-2200 (Li-COR, Nebraska, USA) at the same time with other measurements.…”
Section: Canopy Images Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahrends et al (2009) have showed that there was a delay between maximum gross primary production (GPP) and the time of maximum Gcc, but how to mathematically adjust Gcc to match GPP is unresolved. Nagai et al (2011) reported that RGB indexes could not detect the different characteristics between forest species in spring. Recently, Yang et al (2014) have found that there was a mismatch of the maximum of Gcc value and the maximum of chlorophyll contents, but they have not quantified how to adjust camera-based indexes to reflect chlorophyll contents and other physiological variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have reported that the use of digital images for phenological observations is a low-cost, quantitative method for measuring the timings of SLE and ELF (e.g., Richardson et al 2007;Ahrends et al 2009;Nagai et al 2011a). The use of bio-meteorological data recovered by this approach has a shorter history (e.g., 8 years; Ide and Oguma 2010) than the use of traditional in situ observations (e.g., 30 or 48 years; Matsumoto et al 2003;Menzel et al 2006), which were obtained from studies of plants in botanical gardens or meteorological stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%