2006
DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[408:udpaoi]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using digital photographs and object-based image analysis to estimate percent ground cover in vegetation plots

Abstract: Ground vegetation influences habitat selection and provides critical resources for survival and reproduction of animals. Researchers often employ visual methods to estimate ground cover, but these approaches may be prone to observer bias. We therefore evaluated a method using digital photographs of vegetation to objectively quantify percent ground cover of grasses, forbs, shrubs, litter, and bare ground within 90 plots of 2m2. We carried out object‐based image analysis, using a software program called eCogniti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we assumed that the object-oriented classification would be a better approach than a pixel-based classification. The advantages of object-oriented classification using high-resolution image data have been reported by many studies [59][60][61][62][63]. However, determining appropriate segmentation parameters is a time-consuming process, generally based on trial and error evaluation to derive homogeneous image segments representing similar thematic units such as vegetation types [62,64,65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we assumed that the object-oriented classification would be a better approach than a pixel-based classification. The advantages of object-oriented classification using high-resolution image data have been reported by many studies [59][60][61][62][63]. However, determining appropriate segmentation parameters is a time-consuming process, generally based on trial and error evaluation to derive homogeneous image segments representing similar thematic units such as vegetation types [62,64,65].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient and automatic segmentation of vegetation from images of the ground is an important step for many applications such as weed detection for site-specific treatment (Onyango and Marchant, 2003;Tellaeche et al, 2008a,b;Burgos-Artizzu et al, 2009). Also the ground classification covers a number of ecologically relevant categories (Luscier et al, 2006).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…however, most such studies produced only general categories, such as vegetation and non-vegetation (laliberte et al, 2007). Since wildlife species usually differentiate between vegetation types in their diets (Krebs et al, 2003), categorizing percent plant cover at a more detailed level (e.g., by functional types or species groups, Chen et al, 2009b) (Definiens, 2003), several studies have measured percent cover for vegetation categories on digital photographs, with promising results (booth et al, 2005, 2006aluscier et al, 2006;laliberte et al, 2007;Booth and Cox, 2008). However, classification error resulting from spectral separation methods (vegMeasure, erDAS imagine [erDAS, 2010], eCognition) can cause confusion among like-colored species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%