2022
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2022.2141693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using drawings and explanations based on attentive teaching as a means for understanding the social-ecological systems concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the in-service training course, the participants' conceptualization of teaching had changed, and they recognized the students' contribution to their peers' learning, as well as to the teachers' learning. In previous studies, we examined attentive teaching's ability to generate change in natural science conceptualizations among schoolchildren and adult learners: weight and gravitation [23,24], the day-night concept [22], the planet Earth [14,21], and social-ecological systems [45]. In this study, we dealt with the conceptualization of 'teaching' among experienced teachers, Jewish studies teachers, who implemented attentive teaching in their classes-in subjects unrelated to the natural sciences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the in-service training course, the participants' conceptualization of teaching had changed, and they recognized the students' contribution to their peers' learning, as well as to the teachers' learning. In previous studies, we examined attentive teaching's ability to generate change in natural science conceptualizations among schoolchildren and adult learners: weight and gravitation [23,24], the day-night concept [22], the planet Earth [14,21], and social-ecological systems [45]. In this study, we dealt with the conceptualization of 'teaching' among experienced teachers, Jewish studies teachers, who implemented attentive teaching in their classes-in subjects unrelated to the natural sciences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%