“…Tuning to one and predicting the other is therefore not only feasible but simultaneously a powerful cross-check on the universality properties of the modelling. Additional important quantities to consider for further model tests and tuning would be event shapes at hadron colliders [52,68], observables involving explicit jet reconstructionincluding so-called "charged jets" [22] (a jet algorithm run on a set of charged tracks, omitting neutral energy), which will have fluctuations in the charged-to-neutral ratio overlaid on the energy flow and therefore will be more IR than full jets, but still less so than individual particles, and "EM jets" (a jet algorithm run on a set of charged tracks plus photons), which basically adds back the π 0 component to the charged jets and hence is less IR sensitive than pure charged jets while still remaining free of the noisy environment of hadron calorimeters -explicit underlyingevent, fragmentation, and jet structure (e.g., jet mass, jet shape, jet-jet separation) observables in events with jets [7,[21][22][23][24][25]51,[69][70][71][72][73][74], photon + jet(s) events (including the important γ + 3-jet signature for double-parton interactions [9,11]), Drell-Yan events [21,74,75], and observables sensitive to the initial-state shower evolution in DIS (see, e.g., [38,76]). …”