2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using drive-by health monitoring to detect bridge damage considering environmental and operational effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with FRF and model updating for better identification capability as demonstrated in this paper; (2) The CSAC index in the frequency range between the first two frequencies is found to be sensitive to damage. Thus, this frequency range can be used to identify the damage location and severity in simply supported beams; (3) The objective function can be constructed using CSAC indices of the FRFs between adjacent measurement points.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with FRF and model updating for better identification capability as demonstrated in this paper; (2) The CSAC index in the frequency range between the first two frequencies is found to be sensitive to damage. Thus, this frequency range can be used to identify the damage location and severity in simply supported beams; (3) The objective function can be constructed using CSAC indices of the FRFs between adjacent measurement points.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, developing new damage identification methods is necessary. Over the years, many researchers have developed various bridge structural health-monitoring methods [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Bridge health assessment is usually conducted using static and/or dynamic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the results of the simulation shown in Figure 4 demonstrate the ability of the CP-response to capture the natural frequencies of the bridge, the assumption of a perfectly smooth road surface with no bridge damping is not a realistic one. The influence of the surface roughness of the pavement has been shown to be problematic in drive-by bridge inspection, with the pavement causing the vehicle to vibrate at its own frequencies, covering up the bridge frequencies which are of interest (Hester & González, 2017;Locke et al, 2020).…”
Section: Contact-point Response In the Presence Of Pavement Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As vehicle speed increases, the road profile effects are amplified, the vehicle bridge interaction (VBI) time reduces, and the resolution of the acceleration signal is significantly depleted. Temperature and other environmental effects have been shown to cause a shift in frequency amplitudes due to the associated change in the stress and strain levels in the bridge that accompany climatic changes [9]. A few studies have suggested that the use of multiple runs is a promising approach to tackle these issues [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%