1978
DOI: 10.1029/gl005i005p00411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Dynamo Theory to predict the sunspot number during Solar Cycle 21

Abstract: On physical grounds it is suggested that the sun's polar field strength near a solar minimum is closely related to the following cycle's solar activity. Four methods of estimating the sun's polar magnetic field strength near solar minimum are employed to provide an estimate of cycle 21's yearly mean sunspot number at solar maximum of 140 ± 20. We think of this estimate as a first order attempt to predict the cycle's activity using one parameter of physical importance based upon dynamo theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
227
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
13
227
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…9 and 10 we therefore conclude that the polar field strength at solar sunspot minimum is a precursor of the subsequent sunspot maximum; cf. also Schatten et al (1978) and Svalgaard et al (2005).…”
Section: Polar Variability In the Framework Of The Total Solar Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 and 10 we therefore conclude that the polar field strength at solar sunspot minimum is a precursor of the subsequent sunspot maximum; cf. also Schatten et al (1978) and Svalgaard et al (2005).…”
Section: Polar Variability In the Framework Of The Total Solar Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here I will focus on the work by Cliver and Ling (2010) which also suggested a novel source for such a ground state -the omnipresent slow solar wind. The chain of reasoning that led to this suggestion began with the paper on sunspot cycle prediction by Schatten et al (1978). Schatten et al (1978) argued that because (in the dynamo model for solar activity) poloidal fields at solar minimum provide the "seed" for the toroidal fields of the subsequent maximum, the peak sunspot number of a cycle should be related to the strength of the solar polar fields at the preceding minimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chain of reasoning that led to this suggestion began with the paper on sunspot cycle prediction by Schatten et al (1978). Schatten et al (1978) argued that because (in the dynamo model for solar activity) poloidal fields at solar minimum provide the "seed" for the toroidal fields of the subsequent maximum, the peak sunspot number of a cycle should be related to the strength of the solar polar fields at the preceding minimum. It was difficult to test this idea directly at the time however, because reliable measurements of the solar polar fields had 180 E. W. Cliver been made at only one solar minimum up to that point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the correlation between the polar field maximum and the subsequent cycle strength was proposed by Schatten et al (1978) based on the BL-type FT dynamo, here we would like to stress that not all BL-type FT dynamo can give the correlation. In the BL-type dynamo, poloidal field is generated at surface layer due to the decay of the tilt sunspot groups.…”
Section: Possible Reasons Responsible For the Polar Field Precursormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar polar field was first proposed to be solar cycle precursor by Schatten et al(1978), who suggested the correlation between the polar field near the solar minimum and the subsequent cycle strength. WSO has the continuous solar polar field observations since 1976 shown in Figure 5 (red curve) overplotted with the sunspot number †.…”
Section: Solar Polar Field Precursormentioning
confidence: 99%