Using egocentric analysis to investigate professional networks and productivity of graduate students and faculty in life sciences in Japan, Singapore, and Taiwan

Abstract

Prior studies showed that scientists’ professional networks contribute to research productivity, but little work has examined what factors predict the formation of professional networks. This study sought to 1) examine what factors predict the formation of international ties between faculty and graduate students and 2) identify how these international ties would affect publication productivity in three East Asian countries. Face-to-face surveys and in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of faculty and doctoral students in life sciences at 10 research institutions in Japan, Singapore, and Taiwan. Our final sample consisted of 290 respondents (84 faculty and 206 doctoral students) and 1,435 network members. We used egocentric social network analysis to examine the structure of international ties and how they relate to research productivity. Our findings suggest that overseas graduate training can be a key factor in graduate students’ development of international ties in these countries. Those with a higher proportion of international ties in their professional networks were likely to have published more papers and written more manuscripts. For faculty, international ties did not affect the number of manuscripts written or of papers published, but did correlate with an increase in publishing in top journals. The networks we examined were identified by asking study participants with whom they discuss their research. Because the relationships may not appear in explicit co-authorship networks, these networks were not officially recorded elsewhere. This study sheds light on the relationships of these invisible support networks to researcher productivity.

An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science

“…The third issue relates to synchronous online interactions. When dealing with global collaboration, the problem of time zones frequently arises [40]. This is certainly an unavoidable issue, and hosts and participants need to compromise.…”

Evidence-based approaches for promoting gender equity in global mental health research: Study protocol for social network analysis of researchers in Nepal

“…There is also evidence of better research performance among researchers who have more co-authors, and particularly one frequent, primary co-author ( Abbasi et al., 2012 ). Studies have also shown that international collaboration as assessed by connection of a researcher (node) with a collaborator from an institution in a different country is associated with greater academic productivity (number of papers published), particularly among early-career researchers ( Hara et al., 2017 ). Assessing mentorship potential, especially among early-career researchers using network characteristics, is a relatively new field ( National Academies of Sciences, 2019 ).…”

Information access and sharing among prosthetics and orthotics faculty in Ghana and the United States

“…An information exchange network (EN) is a type of SNA that explores how people within a network share a specific type of information. 12 SNA has been used to examine ENs among healthcare providers, 13 research faculty, 14 and undergraduate students. 15 In addition, the potential to apply SNA in medical education has recently been described.…”