Using Epidemiological Principles to Explain Fungicide Resistance Management Tactics: Why do Mixtures Outperform Alternations?

Abstract

Whether fungicide resistance management is optimized by spraying chemicals with different modes of action as a mixture (i.e., simultaneously) or in alternation (i.e., sequentially) has been studied by experimenters and modelers for decades. However, results have been inconclusive. We use previously parameterized and validated mathematical models of wheat Septoria leaf blotch and grapevine powdery mildew to test which tactic provides better resistance management, using the total yield before resistance causes disease control to become economically ineffective ("lifetime yield") to measure effectiveness. We focus on tactics involving the combination of a low-risk and a high-risk fungicide, and the case in which resistance to the high-risk chemical is complete (i.e., in which there is no partial resistance). Lifetime yield is then optimized by spraying as much low-risk fungicide as is permitted, combined with slightly more high-risk fungicide than needed for acceptable initial disease control, applying these fungicides as a mixture. That mixture rather than alternation gives better performance is invariant to model parameterization and structure, as well as the pathosystem in question. However, if comparison focuses on other metrics, e.g., lifetime yield at full label dose, either mixture or alternation can be optimal. Our work shows how epidemiological principles can explain the evolution of fungicide resistance, and also highlights a theoretical framework to address the question of whether mixture or alternation provides better resistance management. It also demonstrates that precisely how spray tactics are compared must be given careful consideration. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license .

Unconventional Yeasts Are Tolerant to Common Antifungals, and Aureobasidium pullulans Has Low Baseline Sensitivity to Captan, Cyprodinil, and Difenoconazole

“…In general, such biocontrol-fungicide combinations may not only allow reducing the amount of fungicides applied in the field but also prevent the development of resistance against fungicides. To slow down the development of fungicide resistance and prolong the effective lifetime of a fungicide, the use of antifungal agents with different modes of action (either simultaneously, sequentially, or in a single formulation) is recommended [75][76][77]. For example, DFN and CYP have been combined in a single formulation, marketed as InspireSuper ® (Syngenta), and used to efficiently manage disease [29].…”

Herbicide resistance management strategies: how do they compare with those for insecticides, fungicides and antibiotics?

“…Modelling and experimental evidence from many studies show that mixtures of different modes of action are generally more effective than alternations in slowing the evolution of fungicide resistance. [42][43][44] However, both mixtures and alternations are recommended strategies. Ideally, multi-site inhibitors such as mancozeb or clorothalonil are favoured mixing partners because of reduced risk of resistance evolution.…”

Biological impact of ultraviolet-B radiation on spider mites and its application in integrated pest management

“…One advantage of UV technology in IPM is that it enables simultaneous control of spider mites and powdery mildew, both of which are economically important pests of strawberry (Kanto et al 2009(Kanto et al , 2011(Kanto et al , 2014Sugeno et al 2018) and wide range of horticultural crops including rose (Kobayashi et al 2013;Suthaparan et al 2012) and cucumber (Suthaparan et al 2014(Suthaparan et al , 2017. Powdery mildew fungi have developed resistance to a wide range of fungicides due to their frequent application (Elderfield et al 2018;Nakano et al 1992;Sombardier et al 2010;Wyenandt et al 2018).…”