2020
DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1802736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Evaluative Criteria to Review Youth Anxiety Measures, Part I: Self-Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the correlations are lower when comparing the AVAC with total anxiety scores of the SCAS. Although these correlations are on the lower end of the range reported by Etkin et al (2020) , they are comparable with similar correlations in studies, which examine other overarching measures of anxiety symptoms with disorder specific assessments (e.g., Liebowotz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents and State-trait anxiety inventory for children; Schmits et al, 2014 ). Unfortunately, there is no subscale or questionnaire included to measure specific phobia symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the correlations are lower when comparing the AVAC with total anxiety scores of the SCAS. Although these correlations are on the lower end of the range reported by Etkin et al (2020) , they are comparable with similar correlations in studies, which examine other overarching measures of anxiety symptoms with disorder specific assessments (e.g., Liebowotz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents and State-trait anxiety inventory for children; Schmits et al, 2014 ). Unfortunately, there is no subscale or questionnaire included to measure specific phobia symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Both parent and child data indicate either no significant or a slightly significant correlation between the anxiety/avoidance items and externalizing symptoms measured by SDQ. The AVAC shows lower correlations than the other anxiety questionnaires: SCAS and BAER-C ( Essau et al, 2002 ; Etkin et al, 2020 ; Lippert et al, submitted ), in which anxiety or avoidance scores correlate moderately with externalizing symptoms indicating very good divergent validity. Nevertheless, further studies are needed, especially to investigate the distinction between ADHD and Conduct Disorder, which will complement the present findings on divergent validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second limitation is reliance on self-report data, although this was a reasonable place to begin in this underdeveloped line of inquiry and given the strengths/ efficiency of self-report and that the informant data suggest intriguing possibilities (e.g., Etkin et al, 2021). Third, although it is a study strength that our sample contained a relatively high proportion of Hispanic/ Latino participants and that previous randomized CBT efficacy trials focused on anxiety in youths with and without parent involvement showed that Hispanic and non-Hispanic samples responded similarly (Pina, Silverman, Fuentes, et al, 2003;Vaclavik et al, 2017), future research designed from the onset to understand the role of ethnicity-related variables as well as other variables (e.g., acculturation, treatment compliance) that might affect treatment use and outcomes is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of gender- and age-based norms for H/L samples, and to permit comparison of our findings with prior youth anxiety studies with H/L samples (e.g., Pina et al, 2012; Pina, Little, et al, 2009; Silverman et al, 1999, 2009, 2019, 2022; Vaclavik et al, 2017; Varela et al, 2008), we report raw scores in the present study. The RCMAS parent and child versions have extensive validity and reliability data (Reynolds & Richmond, 1978) and are sensitive to change in clinical trials (e.g., Etkin, Lebowitz, et al, 2021; Etkin, Shimshoni, et al, 2021; Silverman et al, 2019, 2022; Silverman & Ollendick, 2005). The Spanish versions of the RCMAS have demonstrated comparable psychometric properties to the English versions (Pina, Little, et al, 2009; Varela et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%