2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Fe chemistry to predict Fe uptake rates for natural plankton assemblages from the Southern Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that EPS can promote natural plankton growth as previously reported in the Sub-Antarctic Zone [ 21 ]. During the same expedition as this study, Cabanes et al [ 23 ] showed that Fe chemical speciation could explain the different Fe uptake rates determined for the same experimental treatments as used here ( Supplementary Tables S11 and S12 ). The latter study showed that inorganic Fe concentrations (Fe’) could explain up to 70% of the Fe uptake rates measured following short-term (24 h) incubations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that EPS can promote natural plankton growth as previously reported in the Sub-Antarctic Zone [ 21 ]. During the same expedition as this study, Cabanes et al [ 23 ] showed that Fe chemical speciation could explain the different Fe uptake rates determined for the same experimental treatments as used here ( Supplementary Tables S11 and S12 ). The latter study showed that inorganic Fe concentrations (Fe’) could explain up to 70% of the Fe uptake rates measured following short-term (24 h) incubations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…During the same expedition, Fe uptake rates also support strong Fe limitation for the Drake Passage sites (Bio 1 and 3) and milder Fe limitation in the coastal WAP (Bio 2) [ 23 ]. Moreover, “mild” to strong Fe-limiting conditions at all study sites are further supported by the comparison of phytoplankton requirements for growth typically reported for Fe-limiting conditions (Kµ; Antarctic Polar Frontal zone, Indian sector, 410–450 pM, [ 43 ]; in and south of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone, Pacific sector, 90–110 pM, [ 44 ]) with inorganic and labile (e.g., highly reactive) Fe concentrations determined at our study sites (1–3 pM, 21–63 pM, respectively; Supplementary Table S11 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations