2003
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.10052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using feedforward neural networks and forward selection of input variables for an ergonomics data classification problem

Abstract: A method was developed to accurately predict the risk of injuries in industrial jobs based on datasets not meeting the assumptions of parametric statistical tools, or being incomplete. Previous research used a backward-elimination process for feedforward neural network (FNN) input variable selection. Simulated annealing (SA) was used as a local search method in conjunction with a conjugate-gradient algorithm to develop an FNN. This article presents an incremental step in the use of FNNs for ergonomics analyses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) charts and the areas under them are used to determine the global predictive power of the created models at different (from standard 0.5) probability cut-off points from within the range [0,1]. Though the obtained classification accuracy rates for our best models are better than those reported in National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOHS) Guides [22], [23] and two of our previous studies [33], [34], they are generally less optimistic than those reported in several of the previous studies [1], [2], [6], [7], [8]; this work offers a more systematic and reliable approach for building and testing the performance of the classifiers to discriminate between high risk and low risk manual lifting tasks that cause LBDs.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) charts and the areas under them are used to determine the global predictive power of the created models at different (from standard 0.5) probability cut-off points from within the range [0,1]. Though the obtained classification accuracy rates for our best models are better than those reported in National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOHS) Guides [22], [23] and two of our previous studies [33], [34], they are generally less optimistic than those reported in several of the previous studies [1], [2], [6], [7], [8]; this work offers a more systematic and reliable approach for building and testing the performance of the classifiers to discriminate between high risk and low risk manual lifting tasks that cause LBDs.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…This was actually the same NN-based model that was reported in their previous study [7]. Chen [8] also generally discussed the ROC charts for classification of LBDs in the context of a cost function and committing the type I and type II errors. The authors, however, neither created nor analyzed ROC charts generated by their models.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(e.g., Karwowski, Jarvinen, and Zurada 1992;Arcand 1994;Jung and Park 1994;Lim, Fok, and Tan 1996;Harden, Crumpton, and Killough 1996;Zurada, Karwowski, and Marras 1997;Carnahan and Redfern 1998;Lin and Hwang 1999;Chen, Kaber, and Dempsey 2000;Chung, Lee, Inseok, Dohyung, and Sang 2002;Kiryu, Shibai, Hayashi, and Tanaka 2002;Kaya et al 2003;Lee, Karwowski, Marras, and Rodrick 2003;Chen, Kaber, and Dempsey 2004;Kolich, Seal, and Taboun 2004). Chen et al (2004) used neural networks for data classification problems. They developed a method to predict the risk of inquiries in industrial jobs.…”
Section: Literature On the Use Of Artificial Neural Network For Ergomentioning
confidence: 97%