2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using FloodRisk GIS freeware for uncertainty analysis of direct economic flood damages in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the NPV estimates comparing action to in-action, uncertainties associated with input runoff volume, threshold criteria, unit costs, and discounting rate demonstrate the most significant impacts. The two largest uncertainty contributions are related to the damage cost functions, thereby confirming the results of previous studies that highlight the importance of this uncertainty contribution [12,15]. Climate factors and investment costs are relatively less important in this case study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the NPV estimates comparing action to in-action, uncertainties associated with input runoff volume, threshold criteria, unit costs, and discounting rate demonstrate the most significant impacts. The two largest uncertainty contributions are related to the damage cost functions, thereby confirming the results of previous studies that highlight the importance of this uncertainty contribution [12,15]. Climate factors and investment costs are relatively less important in this case study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They find that the damage costs are dominating the overall uncertainty. Several other studies have confirmed that this uncertainty is high [13,14], and is also compared to the uncertainty of modelling the hazards [15]. Löwe et al [16] explored the overall uncertainty by defining a number of scenarios and possible variable outcomes and from that calculate both the overall uncertainty and the efficiency of different strategies by presenting resulting flood risk indicators as box plots as a measure of resulting resilience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e outcomes of the study confirm that the knowledge of the magnitude and source of uncertainties helps to improve assessments and leads to better inform decisions on flood risk mitigation alternatives [14]. Moreover, numerical models need to be controlled, for example, through a calibration process that adjusts model parameters, assumptions, or equations to optimize concordance between observed data and model predictions [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…e results showed that poor-resolution DEMs might produce a global high feature agreement score with historical data but may fail to provide good flood extent estimations locally, particularly in flat areas. Instead, high-resolution DEMs (1 to 5 m) remain advantageous for modelling as they represent better the topography of the study area but it is important to carefully calibrate the models by the use of the roughness parameter.e outcomes of the study confirm that the knowledge of the magnitude and source of uncertainties helps to improve assessments and leads to better inform decisions on flood risk mitigation alternatives [14]. Moreover, numerical models need to be controlled, for example, through a calibration process that adjusts model parameters, assumptions, or equations to optimize concordance between observed data and model predictions [15].In this context, remote sensing is a low-cost technology that represents an important source of information in the water-related hazards and in water resource management fields [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%