2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-00959-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using four different clinical tools as predictors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study

Abstract: Background: Treatment of postoperative pain remains a significant clinical problem, and prediction of patients with a risk of higher postoperative pain levels is an important focus. We aimed to identify patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with risk of higher pain levels at 24 h postoperatively by using four simple and easily available clinical tools. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study included 102 patients having THA at Zealand University Hospital in Denmark. The following predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preoperative experimental pain sensitivity predicts acute postoperative pain [10] and can be assessed by diferent types of stimuli. Utilizing thermal, mechanical, ischemic, or electrical stimulations is limited due to the need of equipment, costs, and patients cooperation [8,25]. Pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ) was developed as a clinically useful, valid self-rating measure of pain sensitivity avoiding these limitations with similar results to experimentally derived pain sensitivity assessments [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative experimental pain sensitivity predicts acute postoperative pain [10] and can be assessed by diferent types of stimuli. Utilizing thermal, mechanical, ischemic, or electrical stimulations is limited due to the need of equipment, costs, and patients cooperation [8,25]. Pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ) was developed as a clinically useful, valid self-rating measure of pain sensitivity avoiding these limitations with similar results to experimentally derived pain sensitivity assessments [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%