2008
DOI: 10.1080/03768350802211776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Giddens's theory of ‘structuration’ and Freirean philosophy to understand participation in the Alexandra Renewal Project

Abstract: The main critique raised against participatory approaches to development is that they do not adequately address issues of politics and power. This paper contributes to the theory and practice of participation by introducing a framework drawn from Freirean philosophy and applying Giddens's theory of 'structuration' to that philosophy. Specifically, it focuses on the relocation of people from the banks of the Jukskei River as part of the Alexandra Renewal Project. It draws on the author's interviews with key loc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a flourishing literature on South Africa's social movements, a developing debate about participatory planning and a growing body of work on xenophobic violence; for recent examples see Dawson (2008), Duponchel (2009) and Sinwell (2009). By contrast, academic writing on local political protests is scanty.…”
Section: Existing Analyses and Mbeki-era Protestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a flourishing literature on South Africa's social movements, a developing debate about participatory planning and a growing body of work on xenophobic violence; for recent examples see Dawson (2008), Duponchel (2009) and Sinwell (2009). By contrast, academic writing on local political protests is scanty.…”
Section: Existing Analyses and Mbeki-era Protestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many successes reported in such participatory development projects (Dreyer, 2000); however, there have also been critiques of development practitioners adopting the language of participation without its commitment to empowerment and self-representation--an attempt to implement top-down projects that are framed as "bottom up" (Evans et al, 2004;Few, Brown, & Tompkins, 2007;Parfitt, 2004;Sinwell, 2008). Though Pimbert and Pretty (1996) note that participation can legitimately range from being informed of decisions or being allowed to comment to taking part in joint analysis and decision making, Cooke and Kothari (2001) argue that participation can easily become a form of tyranny where external facilitators maintain control, powerful members of a community dominate, and efforts focus on using specific tools recommended for participatory processes rather than ensuring that those tools actually facilitate a participatory and inclusive process.…”
Section: Literature Review: Power and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of who is considered a legitimate member of this 'we' has been a key contentious issue in township politics across the decades. The following five modes of narrating this 'we' and narrating Alex-1 Research on Alexandra covers local political struggle history (Bozzoli 2010, Lucas 1995), housing (Charlton 2010, Huchzermeyer 2003, participatory democracy and the Alexandra Renewal Project (Khoza 2008, Sinwell 2008 and xenophobia (Tafira 2009, for xenophobia in general see Nyamnjoh 2006).…”
Section: Alexandra Collectively Imagined: Narratives and Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%