2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Google Earth to conduct a neighborhood audit: Reliability of a virtual audit instrument

Abstract: Over the last two decades, the impact of community characteristics on the physical and mental health of residents has emerged as an important frontier of research in population health and health disparities. However, the development and evaluation of measures to capture community characteristics is still at a relatively early stage. The purpose of this work was to assess the reliability of a neighborhood audit instrument administered in the city of Chicago using Google Street View by comparing these "virtual" … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
217
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
217
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A virtual audit has been shown to provide reliable indicators of land use, recreational facilities, and the local food environment at a fraction of the cost of an in-person audit. 35,36 All subject addresses were geocoded, and a trained rater conducted a virtual audit of all four streets in each subject's block using a standardized instrument. A summary urban accessibility score was calculated for each street by summing the number of mobility-enhancing features 37 : (1) sidewalks in place on both sides of the street; (2) continuous sidewalks; (3) smooth/flat/ unbroken sidewalks; (4) free from obstructions; (5) wide enough to allow two people to pass comfortably; and (6) a public transportation stop on the street.…”
Section: Community Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A virtual audit has been shown to provide reliable indicators of land use, recreational facilities, and the local food environment at a fraction of the cost of an in-person audit. 35,36 All subject addresses were geocoded, and a trained rater conducted a virtual audit of all four streets in each subject's block using a standardized instrument. A summary urban accessibility score was calculated for each street by summing the number of mobility-enhancing features 37 : (1) sidewalks in place on both sides of the street; (2) continuous sidewalks; (3) smooth/flat/ unbroken sidewalks; (4) free from obstructions; (5) wide enough to allow two people to pass comfortably; and (6) a public transportation stop on the street.…”
Section: Community Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correspondence between the two data sets was also lower than in other comparability research using the same Chicago SSO data Clarke et al, 2010). However, Bader and colleagues (2010) examined only one type of land use (commercial businesses), and had more information available to achieve comparability between data sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There is a precedent for using web-based mapping technologies to fill gaps and perform neighbourhood audits (Clarke et al 2010;Rundle et al 2011;Rossen et al 2012). Google Maps and Google StreetView were examined for the outlet location using the information contained in the licence record, including, for example, the outlet name, street and locality.…”
Section: Manually Matching Licence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%