Using Google Glass in Surgical Settings: Systematic Review

Abstract

BackgroundIn recent years, wearable devices have become increasingly attractive and the health care industry has been especially drawn to Google Glass because of its ability to serve as a head-mounted wearable device. The use of Google Glass in surgical settings is of particular interest due to the hands-free device potential to streamline workflow and maintain sterile conditions in an operating room environment.ObjectiveThe aim is to conduct a systematic evaluation of the literature on the feasibility and acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings and to assess the potential benefits and limitations of its application.MethodsThe literature was searched for articles published between January 2013 and May 2017. The search included the following databases: PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO (EBSCO), and IEEE Xplore. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text articles. Original research articles that evaluated the feasibility, usability, or acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings were included. This review was completed following the Preferred Reporting Results of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsOf the 520 records obtained, 31 met all predefined criteria and were included in this review. Google Glass was used in various surgical specialties. Most studies were in the United States (23/31, 74%) and all were conducted in hospital settings: 29 in adult hospitals (29/31, 94%) and two in children’s hospitals (2/31, 7%). Sample sizes of participants who wore Google Glass ranged from 1 to 40. Of the 31 studies, 25 (81%) were conducted under real-time conditions or actual clinical care settings, whereas the other six (19%) were conducted under simulated environment. Twenty-six studies were pilot or feasibility studies (84%), three were case studies (10%), and two were randomized controlled trials (6%). The majority of studies examined the potential use of Google Glass as an intraoperative intervention (27/31, 87%), whereas others observed its potential use in preoperative (4/31, 13%) and postoperative settings (5/31, 16%). Google Glass was utilized as a videography and photography device (21/31, 68%), a vital sign monitor (6/31, 19%), a surgical navigation display (5/31, 16%), and as a videoconferencing tool to communicate with remote surgeons intraoperatively (5/31, 16%). Most studies reported moderate or high acceptability of using Google Glass in surgical settings. The main reported limitations of using Google Glass utilization were short battery life (8/31, 26%) and difficulty with hands-free features (5/31, 16%).ConclusionsThere are promising feasibility and usability data of using Google Glass in surgical settings with particular benefits for surgical education and training. Despite existing technical limitations, Google Glass was generally well received and several studies in surgical settings acknowledged its potential for training, consultation, patient monitoring, and a...

Die Implementierung der Telemedizin im urologischen Alltag

“…Hierdurch verbesserte sich die Genauigkeit der Trokarplatzierung im Gegensatz zur Kontrollgruppe, die nicht unterstützt wurde, um 33 %. Ein weiterer vielversprechender Ansatz stellt der Einsatz von Smartglasses dar [21,22], bei dem der Nutzer Fotos und Videos über eine digital vernetzte Brille live im Operationssaal während der Operation sichten kann.…”

Assessment of Google Glass for Photographic Documentation in Veterinary Forensic Pathology: Usability Study

“…It is a head-mounted device designed in the shape of a pair of eyeglasses with a 5.0-megapixel integrated camera; wireless connection; and the ability to take pictures, record a video, and call people with simple voice commands or manually by touching the frame. A small prism placed on the right side of the device allows a display of information to the user [ 1 - 3 ]. As a whole, the multitasking capabilities of the device provide users a comfortable and multifunctional virtual experience.…”

“…As a whole, the multitasking capabilities of the device provide users a comfortable and multifunctional virtual experience. Although these advantages have not fully met the needs of private consumers, its voice control, wireless transmission capabilities, integrated camera, and app customization have attracted the interest of commercial industries and professionals from various fields, including the health care [ 1 , 2 ]. In human medicine, Google Glass has been tested in many nonsurgical fields such as on-demand data visualization and real-time analysis [ 4 ], clinical simulations [ 5 ], management of diabetes [ 6 ], and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ 7 ].…”

Evaluation of Google Glass™ with Camera Adaptor and GoPro™ as Teaching Tools for Endotracheal Intubation in the Austere Medical Environment

“…Recent literature has shown that video laryngoscopy performed by a number of methods can be useful for teaching endotracheal intubation (ETI) to learners at many levels of medical specialization [1]. However, these video laryngoscopes are expensive and provide images of an inconsistent quality [2].…”