2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2017.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using GPS-surveyed intertidal zones to determine the validity of shorelines automatically mapped by Landsat water indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The method described in this work start from a rough shoreline at the pixel level for each of the Landsat scenes that defines the set of initial pixels where the analysis starts. Note that this initial line can be obtained in various ways such as the thresholds implemented in [20,[49][50][51]. Any other accessible line can also be used (such as the shoreline provided by the Instituto Hidrográfico de la Marina for the Spanish territory) but usually these are biased in a magnitude about one Landsat pixel (25-35 m).…”
Section: New Sub-pixel Methodological Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method described in this work start from a rough shoreline at the pixel level for each of the Landsat scenes that defines the set of initial pixels where the analysis starts. Note that this initial line can be obtained in various ways such as the thresholds implemented in [20,[49][50][51]. Any other accessible line can also be used (such as the shoreline provided by the Instituto Hidrográfico de la Marina for the Spanish territory) but usually these are biased in a magnitude about one Landsat pixel (25-35 m).…”
Section: New Sub-pixel Methodological Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data is available as atmospherically and terrain corrected 'analysis-ready' data processed to surface reflectance, allowing reliable spectra to be extracted with no additional processing or calibration required [44]. We focused on five commonly studied environments to explore the influence of contrasting spectral properties on waterline extraction performance: a) sandy beaches [1,6,28,33,34,38,42], b) artificial shorelines [32,45], c) rocky shorelines [10,29,45], d) wetland vegetation [46][47][48], and Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2984 5 of 23 e) tidal mudflats [7,10,19,49].…”
Section: Sample Spectra and Index Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a modification of the NDWI which substitutes short-wave infrared (SWIR) in place of NIR has seen increasing popularity for waterline extraction [22]. This modified normalised difference water index (MNDWI) has been suggested as a more accurate alternative to NDWI, particularly in environments affected by white water from surf or high levels of turbidity [1,33]. However, this index can produce poor results in intertidal environments where wet substrate remaining after high tide is often mapped as open water [19,20].…”
Section: Sample Spectra and Index Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations