2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02571-6_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Grammarware Languages to Define Operational Semantics of Modelled Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the translational approaches (Chen et al, 2005;Di Ruscio et al, 2006;Romero et al, 2007;Gargantini et al, 2009;Sadilek and Wachsmuth, 2009;Simko et al, 2012;Simko, 2014), the semantics of a modeling language are specified as a mapping from the metamodel of the underlying language to a metamodel of another language which already has a wellknown semantics, e.g. abstract state machines (Gurevich, 1995).…”
Section: Formal Approaches For Semantics Specifications Of Modeling Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the translational approaches (Chen et al, 2005;Di Ruscio et al, 2006;Romero et al, 2007;Gargantini et al, 2009;Sadilek and Wachsmuth, 2009;Simko et al, 2012;Simko, 2014), the semantics of a modeling language are specified as a mapping from the metamodel of the underlying language to a metamodel of another language which already has a wellknown semantics, e.g. abstract state machines (Gurevich, 1995).…”
Section: Formal Approaches For Semantics Specifications Of Modeling Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in [10,25] different approaches are taken to assign dynamic semantics of dsls in the context of mde. Here, dynamics are assigned through Abstract State Machines (asms) [4], with extensions to Prolog [30] and Scheme [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The xText (Behrens, Clay, Efftinge, 2010) and the works of Wimmer et al (Wimmer, Kramler, 2005) and (Kunert, 2006) are examples of grammarbased approaches. Operational semantics of modelled languages in modelware TS can be described formally as well (Sadilek, Wachsmuth, 2009).…”
Section: Bridge Grammarware To Modelwarementioning
confidence: 99%