2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using graph convolutional network to characterize individuals with major depressive disorder across multiple imaging sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some limitations should be taken into account when evaluating the present findings. We were not able to reach the classification performance in the case of MDD with HC categorization when compared with the previous approach (36). However, our methods achieve higher performance in subgroup classification.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some limitations should be taken into account when evaluating the present findings. We were not able to reach the classification performance in the case of MDD with HC categorization when compared with the previous approach (36). However, our methods achieve higher performance in subgroup classification.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The link between nodes are represented by a weighted adjacency matrix (A). Each node is linked to its nearest neighbors using a knearest neighbors (KNN) technique to establish edges (36). In order…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is a dramatic divergence in classification accuracies because of the demographic and clinical heterogeneity across MDD studies. Qin et al (2022) noted that while there has been an increasing number of publications, the results are inconsistent with their reported classification accuracies varied from 61.7 to 98.4%. In addition, the optimization of machine learning models typically requires adequate training data to mount generalizability across different samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%