2013 the International Conference on Technological Advances in Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (TAEECE) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/taeece.2013.6557318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using graph transformation and maude to simulate and verify UML models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic mapping for UML-models to a Maude-specification (see [Chama et al, 2013]) is similar to this paper's idea of converting reconfigurable Petri nets. In [Chama et al, 2013] the authors present three steps modeling, analysing and converting to Maude modules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Automatic mapping for UML-models to a Maude-specification (see [Chama et al, 2013]) is similar to this paper's idea of converting reconfigurable Petri nets. In [Chama et al, 2013] the authors present three steps modeling, analysing and converting to Maude modules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, PNML is used as a well-known markup-language for Petri nets. This process divides all components of a Petri net in special Maude-modules (net, semantic and initial markings) which can be used to verify in a same way as in [Chama et al, 2013].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%