2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5047347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using gravity fault identification data in Bandung basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geophysical method is used to identify the exact location of active subterranean faults. Ground penetrating radar [23], geoelectric method [24], gravity method [25], and HVSR inversion method [26], are several geophysical methods commonly used to detect subsurface structures.…”
Section: Geophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geophysical method is used to identify the exact location of active subterranean faults. Ground penetrating radar [23], geoelectric method [24], gravity method [25], and HVSR inversion method [26], are several geophysical methods commonly used to detect subsurface structures.…”
Section: Geophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mud volcano site is shown to be in the low to high residual anomaly zone. Abdurrahman et al (2018) showed that the low to high residual gravity anomaly pattern is associated with the presence of fault structures due to the density contrast caused by the activity of these structures. The low to high residual anomaly pattern at the mud volcano site is thought to be influenced by active tectonic activity between the Indian Ocean and South Java Island plates.…”
Section: Separation Of Gravity Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%